Please Help Prevent a Medical Miscarriage of Justice

Note: yesterday, we put together a viral Twitter thread to bring attention to this case. Today, two pro-freedom Republican lawmakers are using an unprecedented subpoena to overturn the conviction . Please consider reaching out to both of them directly about this ( here and here ) or indirectly on Twitter here to support their efforts and create legislative pressure to overturn this execution.
 In this publication, I have made the case that there is over a century of evidence that sudden infant death syndrome (all of which is comprehensively detailed here ) is linked to excessive vaccination of infants.

 In that article , I provided extensive references for the following points:
 •SIDS “mysteriously” clusters at 2 to 4 months of age —which is also when children happen to receive the vaccines most strongly associated with causing SIDS (e.g., the TDwP pertussis vaccine). Many doctors and patients noticed this, but it has been relentlessly dismissed by the medical industrial complex.
 • As far back as 1933 , case reports were produced of children experiencing brain damage and then infant death shortly after the TDwP shot. (e.g., a 1978 report that studied 15 million TDwP injections linked numerous cases of the vaccine to brain damage and death).
 •In 1979, the CDC also completed its own analysis 1980 of 23 deaths within 28 days of DTwP vaccination, 12 (52.2 %) occurred within 24 hours, and 18 (78.3 %) occurred within one week. In 16 of the 23 deaths, autopsy findings were consistent with SIDS. Of the 16 SIDS deaths, 6 (37.5 %) occurred within 24 hours, and 12 (75 %) occurred within one week.
 • A 1982 study that was inspired by observing 4 cases of SIDS within 19 hours of the TDwP vaccine that then studied 200 randomly selected SIDS cases. They found most of infants had been vaccinated prior to death (6.5% within 12 hours of vaccination, 26% within 3 days, 37% within a week, 61% within two weeks, and 70% within 3 weeks), with death typically following brief periods of irritability, crying, lethargy, upper respiratory tract symptoms, and sleep disturbance. Additionally, their autopsy findings were relatively consistent (e.g. petechiae of lung, pleura, pericardium, and thymus; vascular congestion; pulmonary edema; pneumonitis; and brain edema).
 • In 2014 , mass graves were unearthed for Irish orphans who coincidentally had been test subjects for the early diphtheria vaccine in the 1930s.
 •In addition to there being countless cases of children receiving those vaccines and dying suddenly later in the night, many cases also exist of two twins both dying within 24 hours of the vaccine (e.g., the earliest was in 1946 , while this article reviews 13 cases of simultaneous twin SIDS deaths )—something which is almost impossible to have occurred by chance. Additionally, in many cases (e.g., this 1987 one , this 2007 one , this 2010 one , and this 2013 one ) of twins who died after vaccination and were found dead lying on their backs .
 Note: I believe the immediate twin deaths were likely due to them both receiving a hot vaccine lot (which as I show here , was a longstanding problem with the TDwP vaccine— for example, in 1978-1978 , 11 babies in Tennessee were found to have died within 8 days of a TDwP vaccine, 9 of whom received the same lot—leading the US government to privately acknowledge the deaths may have been due to the vaccine and the manufacturer issuing a memo to spread future lots throughout the country so hot lots would no longer cluster in an area and cause identifiable SIDS outbreaks). One of the truly remarkable things about these events was that the FDA rejected the manufacturer’s proposal to put SIDS on the warning label for the vaccine (although since that time it has been implemented).
 • In 1957 , an Australian MD (Archie Kalokerinos) worked with the Aboriginal community (who were poorly treated in Australia and had abysmal living conditions resulting in a 10% infant mortality rate—compared to 2% in the neighboring regions). He realized this death was largely due to widespread vitamin C deficiencies (as their native diets had been destroyed by colonialism). In many cases, he was able to rescue infants on the verge of death in minutes by giving them vitamin C. Likewise, he showed that vitamin C deficiency also explained the children’s widespread epidemic of pneumonia, severe ear infections, severe infant irritability, and a frequent inability to feed. He eventually ignited national controversy by successfully defending an Aboriginal woman accused of killing her child by proving the bruising on the child’s body was due to scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) rather than child abuse , and when he at last convinced the authorities to start giving vitamin C to Aboriginal children, all of these conditions dropped dramatically. Most importantly, he found that much in the same way an illness (e.g., pneumonia or sepsis) rapidly depleted vitamin C levels (which is essentially why IV vitamin C is so helpful for treating sepsis ), vaccination would severely exacerbate an existing vitamin C deficiency. This was best shown by a vaccination campaign killing 50% of the children in one Aboriginal community (you read that correctly 50%) , and that giving vitamin C to animals before vaccinating them prevented them from dying.
 Note: in addition to this, a large body of evidence links TDwP vaccination to childhood ear infections (e.g., numerous studies have found that vaccinated children are 3-50 times more likely to get them).
 • Japan's decision to delay the scheduled DTwP vaccination by 20 months resulted in an 85-90% reduction in the instances of SIDS.
 • When SIDS cases at morgues are examined , they cluster at precisely 2, 4, or 6 months of age (rather than spread throughout the 2 to 6 month period).
 •Prior to the mass vaccination programs in America, SIDS was very rare ( to the point few were even aware crib death occurred ), but rapidly spiked (to the point a new diagnosis category had to be made) after national mass vaccination and before long became the leading cause of death in the first 12 months of life . For instance, between 1953 to 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota , the rate of SIDS went from 0.55% to 12.8% of live births (going from 2.5% to 17.9% of total infant deaths), with 85% occurring within the first 6 months of infancy. In contrast, during that same time, almost every other childhood disease was continually decreasing.
 • A 2011 study showed there is a direct correlation between how many vaccines a country gives their children and their infant mortality rate.

•While the rates of SIDS steadily increased, once the TDwP vaccine was replaced with the safer TDaP vaccine between 1991-1996, it began to decrease. This reduction is commonly attributed to the Back to Sleep campaign , but this ignores the fact that the decline began before the campaign . That many infants (e.g., the twins) have been found dead lying on their backs, and that prior to the TDwP vaccine, sleeping on the back wasn’t an issue.
 • When cases of SIDS are analyzed in VAERS , they cluster next to vaccination (e.g., 75% occur within 1 week of vaccination and comprise almost all infant deaths associated with vaccination).
 •The National Vaccine Injury Act was passed in response to growing public outrage over DTwP deaths due to NBC airing a national story on the dangers of this vaccine (something which would never air in the more corrupt media of today):

 •That documentary and the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act resulted in a safer DTwP vaccine (DTaP) being made (which still causes SIDS but not as frequently). Unfortunately, the DTwP vaccine is still used in Africa. W hen extensively studied , it was found to make children 5 times as likely to die (3.93 for boys and 9.98 for girls).
 Note: while some died shortly after vaccination, the primary cause of their deaths was chronic immune suppression which made them more vulnerable to the numerous deadly infections existing in that region.
 •When COVID happened, many in the vaccine safety community predicted the lockdowns would lead to a massive drop in SIDS cases (since children were skipping their non-essential vaccine appointments). As I show here, this indeed was what happened (and likewise happened shortly after in Florida once large numbers of parents opted out of routine vaccination). To this day, no explanation has ever been provided for this mysterious decline in SIDS.
 The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. To see how others have benefitted from this newsletter, click here !

 How Vaccines Cause SIDS
 Presently, the following is known about vaccines and SIDS:
 •The more vaccines are given concurrently, and the more premature an infant is, the more likely they are to die after vaccination (e.g., I summarized 4 studies showing the former and 14 showing the latter here ).
 •In many cases, this death can be observed to be preceded by intermittent cessations of breathing and a slowed heart rate. In many cases, when children are in the NICU (which is often the case for premature infants), their breathing can be observed to become interrupted following vaccination (e.g., I summarized 12 studies that observed this here ).
 •Those results inspired investigators to begin testing respiration function in infants at home with home monitoring systems, and from that, it was observed that TDaP frequently led to intermittent interruptions of breathing .
 All of this, in short, suggests that vaccination can interrupt the automatic breathing mechanism and that when this happens at home (rather than in a hospital where it can be flagged by the monitors and the infant saved with CPR), those babies die.
 Presently, I believe this occurs because vaccines, due to their impairment of the physiologic zeta potential , often cause microstrokes in the brain that can be easily detected by basic neurologic evaluations (discussed further here ). These microstrokes result from a critical threshold being passed, which helps to explain why premature infants (who are smaller) are less able to tolerate standard vaccine doses, and why more vaccines being given concurrently are more likely to cause this to happen.
 As it happens, the most vulnerable area of the brain to these microstrokes is the region that allows the eyes to move outward s. In turn, a loss of smooth outwards tracking of the eyes is one of the most common vaccine injuries (e.g., this happened to many people I know following COVID vaccination).
 As it so happens, the region of the brain that controls respiration is very close to the part of the brain that controls outward eye tracking movements (marked as a 6 for CN-VI in the below image):

 In turn, there have been many cases of inward deviated eyes proceeding respiratory interruptions, including one documented one where both eyes turn inwards (indicating a more severe compromise of the blood supply) which was then followed by SIDS .
 In addition to these findings, numerous autopsies in SIDS cases have been conducted which have found the following:
 Abnormal neuropathologic findings were acute congestion, defective blood–brain barrier, slight infiltration of the leptomeninx by macrophages and lymphocytes, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration, diffuse infiltration of the pons, mesencephalon and cortex by T-lymphocytes, microglia in the hippocampus and pons, and in one case of necrosis in the cerebellum.
 Histological examination revealed polivisceral stasis, and mild cerebral edema. Acute pulmonary edema mixed with areas of acute pulmonary emphysema were recorded. Myocardial interstitial oedema was also detected. Histological examination of the cardiac conduction system was unremarkable. Small intraparenchymal hemorrhages on the spleen and adrenal glands were observed. Pulmonary mast cells were identified and quantified, and a great number of degranulating mast cells with tryptase-positive material outside were observed (Fig. 2). Data resulting from quantitative analysis recorded a numerical increase in pulmonary mast cells in fatal anaphylactic shock (average mast-cell count 12471/100 mm2 ) compared with that of the traumatic control group (traumatic death) whose average mast-cell count was 3657/100 mm2.
 These findings are consistent with a heightened inflammatory response, microstrokes occurring, and leaky blood vessels (a characteristic result of scurvy and, thus the vitamin C deficiency described by Archie Kalokerinos MD).
 Furthermore, many also associated SIDS with the brain inflammation vaccines (particularly DTwP) that would frequently cause (e.g., there is a characteristic piercing cry infants with brain inflammation will frequently utter). One of the particularly interesting aspects of this was that once the DTwP vaccine entered the market, a variety of behavioral changes were observed in the generations that followed (e.g., autism, flat affects, being more disconnected ADHD, sociopathic behavior) . I can personally attest to having witnessed many of those cases myself. Remarkably, many of these personality changes are identical to what had previously been observed in patients who had encephalitis .
 Note: the damage the vaccines (particularly DTwP) have done to the collective consciousness of American society are profound, and one of the most widely read articles I wrote here was an attempt to clearly synopsize the data for what happened.

 Shaken Baby Syndrome
 In 1971, the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome was created , which essentially argued that abusive parents/caretakers who violently shook their babies would cause diffuse bleeding and swelling in their brains. This diagnosis has been incredibly controversial because the evidence linking it is weak and inconsistent (e.g., the symptoms are non-specific), and in recent years, the medical consensus has gradually turned against the diagnosis (e.g., see this 2016 article and this 2017 review showing there is a severe lack of evidence substantiating this condition), resulting in more and more courts dropping convictions for shaken baby syndrome .
 If we look at the Wikipedia article on it ( which represents the generally recognized consensus on the topic ), there are a few passages that need to be highlighted:
 Episodes of colic are greatest at 6 to 8 weeks of age, and studies have shown a peak in SBS incidence during this time as parents may perceive these episodes as excessive crying.
 There is a strong association between crying and SBS, where studies indicate 1-6% of parents have shaken their babies to stop crying.
 Effects of SBS are thought to be diffuse axonal injury, oxygen deprivation and swelling of the brain ] which can raise pressure inside the skull and damage delicate brain tissue, although witnessed shaking events have not led to such injuries.
 Diagnosis can be difficult as symptoms may be nonspecific. Symptoms may include altered mental status, trouble breathing, and vomiting. As a result, about 31% of true SBS cases may go unnoticed initially. However, imaging can provide valuable information about a potential SBS diagnosis. Imaging must be performed within at least 24 hours of the suspected injury to detect brain edema characteristic of SBS
 While the findings of SBS are complex and many, they are often incorrectly referred to as a "triad" for legal proceedings; distilled down to retinal hemorrhages, subdural hematomas, and encephalopathy.
 SBS may be misdiagnosed, underdiagnosed, and overdiagnosed and caregivers may lie or be unaware of the mechanism of injury. Commonly, there are no externally visible signs of the condition. Examination by an experienced ophthalmologist is critical in diagnosing shaken baby syndrome, as particular forms of ocular bleeding are strongly associated with AHT.
 In 2012, Norman Guthkelch, the neurosurgeon often credited with "discovering" the diagnosis of SBS, published an article "after 40 years of consideration," which is harshly critical of shaken baby prosecutions based solely on the triad of injuries. Again, in 2012, Guthkelch stated in an interview, "I think we need to go back to the drawing board and make a more thorough assessment of these fatal cases, and I am going to bet ... that we are going to find in every – or at least the large majority of cases, the child had another severe illness of some sort which was missed until too late. Furthermore, in 2015, Guthkelch went so far as to say, "I was against defining this thing as a syndrome in the first instance. To go on and say every time you see it, it's a crime... It became an easy way to go into jail.’’
 Note: the unrelating encephalitis cry (which many parents of vaccine injured children notice begins after vaccination) was one of the first things that made me aware of the fact vaccines weren’t safe, as if you feel into it, you can tell rather than being unhappy, something is wrong with the infant. Remarkably, in the book Peter Hotez (one of the world’s leading proponents of vaccination) wrote to debunk the link between vaccination and autism, he stated that prior to his daughter becoming autistic , she had a piercing cry that could be heard throughout the neighborhood—which again illustrates how blind the medical things are to obvious things right in front of them (e.g., the association between shaken baby syndrome and infants crying is widely assumed to be due to the crying provoking the parents into shaking them to death in an attempt to quiet them).
 In turn, over the years, many physicians (besides just Archie Kalokerinos) have argued that shaken baby syndrome was a misdiagnosis for SIDS. For example:
 • This 2004 rapid response published in the BMJ which noted:
 A review where 9 children with the classic signs of shaken baby syndrome (subdural hemorrhages and retinal petechiae) had no suspicion by their doctors of having been abused that in the past.

 The symptoms attributed to shaken baby syndrome were previously diagnosed as Barlow’s disease and attributed to a lack of vitamin C.

 In the past, these signs of a clinical vitamin C deficiency in the mother were cited as a reason to terminate pregnancies (as the children would be at a risk of complications throughout life).

 Low vitamin C raised histamine levels (which causes vessel bleeding).

 When 437 outwardly normal adults in New York were tested, 3% were found to have dangerously low vitamin C levels and very high histamine levels.

 • This 2006 paper noted that:
 The children in the original paper used to create the diagnosis of “shaken baby syndrome” all had the characteristics of infantile scurvy (vitamin C deficiency).

 That the histamine release trigged by the inflammation induced by vaccination could create the blood vessel leakage observed in those cases.

 That children in Japan (where vaccination is delayed) mysteriously are “shaken” at 4-7 months of age rather than at 2-4 months of age in the United States.

 That many bleeds that “result from shaking” were observed in children who could not have possibly been shaken (e.g., because they were still in the uterus or had just been born).

 • This 2006 paper reviewed two cases of children with all the classic signs of shaken baby syndrome who had never been shaken, were vitamin C deficient, and had their symptoms emerge following vaccination (which in turn was followed by respiratory arrest).
 • A physician who reviewed numerous cases of shaken baby syndrome found that in over half the cases, it was preceded by vaccination, signs of a vaccination injury and intense crying. He also noted that contrary to what the shaken baby syndrome experts claimed, there were a variety of medical conditions (besides shaking a baby) which could cause the classic signs of shaken baby syndrome.
 Robert Roberson

 A few hours ago, I found out about Robert Roberson’s case, which is presently being covered in the national media (including many liberal outlets) because it is viewed as an extremely unjust execution by the State of Texas (which is well-known for not granting clemency or stays of execution to convicted murders). His final appeal before his execution tomorrow night was denied.
 If you view a brief video made about the situation, it should be clear why many (including the detective who originally convicted him) are extremely upset about this execution:

 Specifically:
 •He appears to be a very nice and remorseful individual.
 • The basis of convicting him for the murder was that he did not show immense remorse when he brought his dead daughter to the hospital and hence everyone who saw him (e.g., the hospital workers) assumed he must have killed her. However, it was later learned that in additionally to being developmentally delayed (he only made it to 8th grade) he was also autistic (both of which I would argue was likely due to a DTwP vaccine injury ) and hence had a flat affect, which made him not overtly demonstrate remorse (as autistic people often have difficultly externally showing how they feel).

•The expert who’s testimony convicted Roberson (for Shaken Baby Syndrome) convicted another individual whose conviction was overturned and hence there is a clear precedent to not execute Roberson.
 • Many major issues were discovered in his trial that should have resulted in his case being thrown out or retried (but nonetheless were ignored by Texas).

• The basis for his murder conviction (shaken baby syndrome) is a diagnosis no longer supported by the evidence or supported by experts (e.g., the AAP, which previously zealously supported the diagnosis,  has now backed off it, and the expert who popularized the diagnosis shortly before his death stated “I am doing what I can so long as I have a breath to correct a grossly unjust situation.” ), and to date, at least 32 parents and caregivers in 18 states have been exonerated after being wrongfully convicted under the shaken baby hypothesis.
 • Many existing medical conditions could have explained his daughter’s death (e.g., in the 5 days before her death, she had continual vomiting, coughing, and diarrhea). Likewise, when she was seen ato the ER for this, her doctor inappropriately prescribed two drugs (which now have warnings for being given to children due to the drugs causing breathing difficulties and death) then shortly after went to sleep, stopped breathing and died (which the father—who had slept with her in his arms because he was worried about her—noticed when he woke up next to her and she had turned blue). Likewise, she had many signs of pneumonia and sepsis that numerous medical experts have since testified were the actual cause of her death. Sadly however, her ER doctor did not recognize this and instead simply gave her an opioid to reduce her symptoms, which was at lethal levels in her blood at the time she died (likely triggering respiratory arrest—and now has a blackbox warning against giving it to children for this very reason) along with an anti-nausea drug which was also found at dangerously high levels and no longer given to children because it can cause respiratory arrest.

•A recently discovered CT scan determined she had only suffered a minor impact to the head (which an expert agreed was like from falling out of bed, as the father had said happened shortly before she passed out and never woke up) that could not account for the brain changes observed (which means there had to have been a disease process directly affecting the brain).
 • An “expert” who testified at his trial asserted he sexually abused his daughter (without providing evidence to substantiate her claim and rather simply asserted her hatred of pedophiles) was subsequently discovered to have lied about her certification (she wasn’t actually an expert in the area).
 •He will be the first person to ever be executed for shaking his baby to death.
 I then looked at the medical history of the case and discovered:
 Days after her birth, Nikki had the first of many infections that proved resistant to multiple antibiotics, including chronic ear infections that persisted even after she had had tubes surgically implanted. She also had a history of unexplained “breathing apnea” that caused her to suddenly stop breathing, collapse, and turn blue.
 In other words, beyond her doctor missing an emergent pneumonia diagnosis (and instead prescribing lethal medications), she also had two classic signs of vaccine injury—recurring ear infections and recurring episodes of apnea (breathing cessation)—the exact same thing that has been observed repeatedly to result from vaccination and cause SIDS (along with the general immune suppression observed in the African DTwP studies.
 Conclusion
 In my eyes, one of the most evil things about the medical industrial complex is when individuals are criminally prosecuted for the harm pharmaceutical drug companies cause to protect their market share. For example, in a previous article , I highlighted the immense amount of evidence (which has been known since the first clinical trials) that antidepressants can cause violent and psychotic behavior, which typically results in violent suicides, but sometimes results in grisly murders or mass shootings (many of which when you hear the “murders” side of the story are incredibly sad).
 However, while courts outside the United States have been willing to exonerate individuals who killed someone they deeply cared about while on an antidepressant ( many of these stories are absolutely heart-wrenching ), the pharmaceutical industry effectively captured the US court system (e.g., the FDA intervened in cases, and Pfizer put out a prosecutor manual to help prosecutors convict “Zoloft murders”).
 In turn, I believe shaken baby syndrome represents a similar miscarriage of injustice. On one hand, it is immensely fortunate this unscientific diagnosis is being overturned by a wealth of scientific evidence. However, it is nonetheless extremely unfortunate that Robert Roberson (who has now spent 20 years on death row) may be executed tomorrow at 7 pm central time—especially since his daughter’s death was a clearcut case of medical malpractice .
 Share
 For this reason and because of how much this case upsets me (e.g., I can only imagine what this whole thing has been like for Roberson), I am reaching out through my network to bring attention to this case and humbly request that you share this article with anyone you know who may be able to bring attention to his situation, and, as the Innocence Project suggests, do any or all of the following:
 Call Gov. Abbott at 361-264-9653

 Sign the petition to stop Mr. Roberson’s execution .

 Share Mr. Roberson’s case on all social media channels using our social media toolkit.

 Use your voice — create an Instagram post, reel, or TikTok to share the background of Mr. Roberson’s case, the reasons he’s innocent, and all the missteps in this miscarriage of justice, and urge your followers to sign our petition.

 Additionally, please share this thread on Twitter (which can be viewed here ) we are making go viral.
 I sincerely thank you for your help on this matter, and I again apologize for the rushed nature of this article.  One of the most tragic things about SIDS is that since babies can’t speak, it’s often difficult for anyone besides their mother to recognize vaccine injuries, let alone the trauma of a sudden death.  Fortunately, this is beginning to change as the sudden adult deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines were so unmistakable. They began making others become open to the possibility things like SIDS could also be linked to vaccines, and it is my sincere hope we are nearing a tipping point to stop tragedies like this from continuing (especially given how many on the left also oppose him being executed for “Shaken Baby Syndrome”).
 The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 Click below to share this article!

 Share

 To learn how other readers have benefitted from this publication and the community it has created, their feedback can be viewed here . Additionally, an index of all the articles published in the Forgotten Side of Medicine can be viewed here .

Summary: The reprehensible story behind Shaken Baby Syndrome covering up vaccine induced infant deaths.


Are Medical Errors On the Rise Due To Cognitive Impacts Of The mRNA Vaccine?

As a quick aside, yesterday, we put together a viral Twitter thread to bring attention to this case. Today, two pro-freedom Republican lawmakers are using an unprecedented subpoena to overturn the conviction . Please consider reaching out to both of them directly about this ( here and here ) or indirectly on Twitter here to support their efforts and create legislative pressure to overturn this execution.
 As the title of this post reflects, I recently developed a growing concern that health care providers are “not as sharp” as they used to be and, as you will learn from the cases I will present below, that may be putting it mildly.
 Why would I hypothesize about a sudden deterioration in the cognitive and technical abilities of health care providers? Couple of reasons;
 The most mRNA vaccinated sub-population in the United States are almost certainly our health care providers. They make up the entire class of employees mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency that governs the two federal/state health insurance plans for the elderly and poor. Recall that 25 states fought back against CMS by issuing injunctions against the mandate until the Supreme Court granted CMS the authority to do so. Which meant that all CMS facility employees (every hospital, nursing home, and home health agency employee in the country) had to get the mRNA vaccine otherwise they would not be eligible for reimbursement for their services from those entities. That does not make for a valuable employee.

 The mRNA “vaccine,” like Covid itself, causes immense amounts of cognitive dysfunction, i.e. “brain fog” and worse. In my Leading Edge Clinic specialty practice where we treat Long Covid/Long Vax (70% are Long Vax) of the almost 1500 chronically ill patients we have encountered, the vast majority report new-onset cognitive dysfunction.

 The real tragedy is that the mandate from CMS specified that “accommodations” (i.e. exemptions) should be offerred by the involved health care facilities, however, as we well know, in the vast majority of facilities, exemptions were nearly impossible to obtain. Numerous lawsuits are ongoing to address the horrific negative consequences of the mass firings that resulted. The bright side is that I am hearing from my Covid litigation experts that these cases are now being regularly won .
 However, the behavior of the many corporate health systems around the country effectively “weeded out” all unvaccinated employees. Although a number of centers apparently now welcome back their former unvaccinated employees, it appears that not many as hoped wanted to return to a former employer that treated them that way. Thus, I maintain that the vast majority of those currently working in the system are vaccinated, and heavily vaccinated at that.
 So, if they are so heavily vaccinated, what is the probability that they are suffering cognitive issues? Well, from my recent (surprisingly popular) post about the goings on at Ohio State Medical Center, apparently numerous docs were retiring or going out on disability due to “neurological issues.”
 The “anecdotes” I cited in that post are further supported by two recent papers out of South Korea which found shocking negative impacts on cognitive abilities in those who underwent mRNA vaccination. A Midwestern Doctor did an excellent job in not only analyzing that paper but also putting the Korean studies into the context of what we already know about the cognitive impacts of the mRNA platform. I am going to bullet some of the numerous data points AMD cited, beginning with the South Korea studies which analyzed a large database of the inhabitants of Seoul where vaccination status was accurately recorded. It’s not good:
 One of their papers published in Nature (one of the top medical journals) found a 68% increase in depression, a 44% increase in anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, a 93.4% increase in sleep disorders, a 77% decrease in schizophrenia, and a 32.8% decrease in bipolar disorder.

 Another of their analyses was published by the senior author, again in a mainstream journal. It analyzed individuals over 65 and found COVID vaccination increased the risk of mild cognitive impairment 138% and the risk of Alzheimer’s by 23%, and a smaller increase in vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease the authors did not deem to be significant.

 In line with the above, I will include a couple of “anecdotes” written as subscriber comments to AMD’s article which I found unsurprising and in keeping with my own professional experience and the data above:
 Thank you for confirming what many of us have known for years. Within a few months of the jab, my mother developed severe cognitive issues. I personally labeled it 'sudden onset dementia.' The doctors have not diagnosed her issues as dementia but I worked on an Alzheimer’s/Dementia unit years ago and the patients exhibited similar symptoms.
 And another one:
 Can confirm cognitive impairment is real. Nearly lost my job because my short term memory was severely impaired. Could not remember the 6 digit code generated by a crypto card used for signing on to computer systems. I had to enter 1 number, look down at the card again, enter 1 number, look again. This was just one of the manifestations. More complex equations, calculations and datasets were jumbled strings of nonsense. Finally got the info to go see a FLCCC affiliated physician and they started me on the very long road to some form of normalcy and productivity. I still have episodes of brain fog and multi-hour stretches where I'm unable to concentrate on complex topics, but the productive hours greatly outnumber those in deficit.
 I myself had a close colleague who, in 2021, had to stop rounding in the ICU for several months after the mRNA vaccine because they couldn’t remember critical details. Another colleague, Dr. Robert Jackson in Missouri, is a truly brilliant rheumatologist who has helped me develop and refine my therapeutic approaches in my Long Covid/Long Vax practice . He relayed to me that when he got Covid in late 2020, he developed “brain fog” that was somewhat manageable, but then after his vaccine in Feb. 2021, the cognitive deficits were greatly amplified (think spike in brain). The symptoms became so pronounced that he thought he was going to have to retire. He told me he would stare off into space, could not remember critical details, could not process or organize tasks etc. Luckily he found therapies which reversed this issue and he did not have to retire.
 FURTHER EVIDENCE OF COGNITIVE HARMS
 Lets go through some more of the evidence of cognitive harm, some of which I compiled myself, but I also liberally borrowed from AMD’s comprehensive review titled, “ We Now Have Proof The COVID Vaccines Damage Cognition .”
 I will bullet some of the major data sources they found:
 VAERS detected a massive spike in cognitive issues being reported to it after the COVID vaccines hit the market.

 Admissions to a nursing home significantly increased, shown by this large data set from the Netherlands .

 Ed Dowd has repeatedly documented a large increase in physical and cognitive disability throughout the adult population, beginning with the onset of the mRNA campaign:

 Steve Kirsch was contacted by a whistleblower who reported there had been a 25 fold increase in sudden dementia at the nursing home where she works.

 From Igor Chudov’s article on the topic :

 I own a small business and deal with many people and other small businesses. Most provided reliable service, would remember appointments, followed up on issues, and so on. I noticed that lately, some people have become less capable cognitively. They forget essential appointments, cannot concentrate, make crazy-stupid mistakes, and so on.
 Igor’s anecdote above was also supported by one of my best and oldest friends who is the mayor of a village of over 3,000 inhabitants. He reported to me that he finds he has to do a lot more tasks at town hall because things he used to be able to delegate kept not getting done or got done incorrectly.
 Igor Chudov also identified another dataset from the Netherlands which further corroborated a massive cognitive decline:

 In the first quarter of 2023, there was a 24% increase in GP [general practioner] visits related to memory and concentration problems among adults (age 25 years and older) compared to the same period in 2020. This is evidenced by the latest quarterly research update from the GOR Network .
 More specifically they found:
•No increase was observed in adults under 25 years old.
•A 31% increase was observed in those 24-44 years old.
•A 40% increase was observed in those 45-74 years old.
•A 18% increase was observed in those over 75 years old.
 Now, although I have not yet presented the anecdotes of the medical errors reported to me yet, I initially questioned whether they were “Vaxxidents.” One of the reasons I used the word “Vaxxident” is that I have been aware for a while now that motor vehicle accidents greatly increased during the pandemic. Since they started to increase in 2020 before the jabs, obviously that suggests that Long Covid may be a significant contributor, but the greater increases in 2021 suggest the jabs may have compounded the issue, almost like the case of Dr. Robert Jackson above:.

 The above chart and the below comments are taken from the Substack of the brilliant actuary Mary Pat Campbell from her posts on the rise in motor vehicle accidents. Note that she hypothesizes that the rise was largely due to less people on roads and thus faster speeds, but, as you can tell, my hypothesis is a bit different. Anyway, she wrote:
 The low for the period above occurred in February 2010 , when there was only an average of 77.9 motor vehicle accident deaths per day.
 Before that, the local high had been in July 2007 , at a high of 141.6 deaths/day. The most recent high occurred in October 2022 , at 144.6 deaths/day. Interesting it took 15 years to get back to that level… and that’s not a good thing.
 Then I picked out January 2022 — it was a low point for 2022, and January tends to be a low point for most years.
 But I picked it out specifically so you could compare it against the rates in 2018 and 2019. That low in 2022 is only a few percentage points below the high from the pre-pandemic rates.
 Also, per Brave Browser AI: “ Record high in 2022 : Fatal car crashes reached a record high in early 2022, with road safety experts attributing this to pandemic-fueled risky driving behaviors such as fewer seat belts, more speeding, and impaired driving.”
 If you look at the full historical data on traffic fatalitie s in Wikipedia, one data point jumped out at me, which is that in 2021 there was an 11.1% increase in per capita traffic fatalities compared to 2020. Not since 1945 has there been a double digit percent increase in this metric from one year to the next.
 AMD’s post even included a quote from me, which I will include (thus I am citing someone who is citing myself - weird :)
 In my practice of treating vaccine injuries, one of the three most common symptoms I see is brain fog. So many of my patients had been in the prime of their lives, can now barely function, have significant cognitive impairment and need a lot of help from our nurses to carry out their treatment plans. I never imagined I would see any of this in people far younger than me and instead I see it every day. I bear witness to an immense amount of suffering on a daily basis that is hard to put into words.
 PATIENT REPORTS OF PROVIDER ERRORS
 Now, to the point of this post, I will present a few cases of poor medical care which I think may have resulted from the adverse impacts of the mRNA vaccines. Let me state from the outset that I have no direct evidence that in these cases the physicians were vaccinated or that they had cognitive deficits from the vaccine and I also must recognize that Long Covid can cause cognitive issues/brain fog as well. However, like the three Uruguayan soccer players who collapsed within a week of each other ( presented in my last post) , the four cases below came to my attention in a three day span.
 If I am being unnecessarily alarmist or insufficiently prudent by raising concern over the cognitive health of doctors in the U.S medical system, forgive me. I figured this Substack is a safe place “to be real” with my theorizing so here goes.
 Case 1 - I saw a young woman with metastatic osteosarcoma whose parents consulted me for complementary cancer care. Initially her tumor was isolated to her leg and she needed it resected. Her family consulted what they described as a “highly experienced surgeon of over 30 years regarded by many to be the most skilled in the area.” However, after leaving the operating room (OR), tragedy ensued when she had to be brought back to the OR on the same day due to excruciating and unrelenting pain. The 2nd operation required numerous other specialty surgeons (vascular and nerve) to be brought in to assist in repairing what was essentially (not literally) described in the record as consistent with a “botched” surgery. Apparently, the surgeon failed to reconnect major arteries and nerves. This led to her undergoing a total of 6 surgeries in a 35 day hospital stay, and although she was discharged with two legs, the botched leg eventually proved non-functional and was subsequently amputated 9 months later. Note she is a teenager. Vaxxident?
 Case 2 - A day later I saw a patient with a chronic fibrosing lung disease, likely autoimmune in nature and who has been on a strong immunosuppressant for over a year. The good thing is that when reviewing her records, and in particular, her pulmonary function testing over the past year (four of them in total), numerous indices of lung function showed steady, significant improvements every 3-4 months and clinically she was regaining exertional tolerance etc. However, she was upset because she told me that the pulmonologist who had been treating her over the past year had been repeatedly telling her that her disease was severe and getting worse, until finally, in the visit the day before she saw me, he realized that her lungs had actually gotten better and told her so. She got upset with him for causing her so much anxiety over the past year that she fired him. Note he did not apologize and instead reminded her of his credentials and experience. My take is that when looking at the chart of her lung function indices, instead of looking at them chronologically from left to right as they were arranged (they are not always done this way), he had been looking right to left and thus misdiagnosed her as worsening. Vaxident?
 Case 3 - A day after the above two cases, a colleague sent me an article about the case of a surgeon who removed someones liver instead of the spleen (the planned surgery). Note the spleen is on the way left side of the abdomen and the liver is on the right, and they look little like each other. Plus removing livers is not a thing (unless you are transplanting). The same surgeon, in 2023, also removed parts of someones pancreas instead of doing the intended surgery of removing the adrenal gland. Vaxidents?
 Case 4 - the wife of a patient told me in passing about her 88 year old mothers recent ER visit for atrial fibrillation where she needed electrical cardioversion. The patient told me how upsetting it was being there because no-one was communicating with her about how her mother was doing with the cardioversion. She finally was able to engage with a nurse and asked her about how her mothers cardiac rhythm was doing. The nurse looked at the cardiac monitor station and told my patient that her mothers rate and rhythm were “just fine.” When my patient pointed out that, to her untrained eye, the rate and rhythm appeared quite abnormal on the monitor that was in her mothers actual room. The nurse looked again at the monitors and said “sorry, let me get the doctor to come talk to you.” Vaxxident?
 PHYSICIAN ERROR RATES SINCE THE PANDEMIC
 So, given the data above supports a hypothesis that physicians may be committing more errors than in the past, or at least have cognitive dysfunction which would lead to that, does available data support this hypothesis, i.e. is there data showing increases in physician errors, malpractice lawsuits, or complaints against physicians since the roll-out of the jab campaign?
 One problem with proving that using existing data is that as I started to research, I quickly discovered something that researchers in the field have long recognized, that papers and databases on medical errors have varied rates due variabilities in reporting, geography, general health disparities etc. I found it difficult to find one source that presented rates year by year. The best paper that I could find which studied medial errors was done by Hopkins and published in JAMA in 2019 here .
 It was a study of a representative sample of hospitals consisting of patients who went to ICU and/or died in hospital:
 23% experienced a diagnostic error while hospitalized (wow).

 Errors were judged to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in 436 patients (17.8%)

 Among the 1863 patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 6.6%

 Again, that was from 2019 and I could find no more recent analysis to compare to. So I then looked at the National Provider Data Bank which logs malpractice claims against physicians. Although there were drops in 2020 and 2021, note that these claims are recorded only when paid out, not when filed, so we will not know for a couple of years at least whether malpractice suits have gone up. The drops in claims during 2020 and 2021 likely reflect the impacts of Covid measures on the courts.

 SENTINEL EVENTS
 What I did find was disturbing trend of data regarding “sentinel events” in hospitals. First, lets go over the definition of a sentinel event:
 A “sentinel event” is an unexpected occurrence in a healthcare setting that results in:
 Death

 Permanent harm (e.g., loss of limb or function)

 Severe temporary harm (e.g., significant disability or disfigurement)

 These events are not related to the natural course of the patient’s illness and are often caused by major mistakes or negligence on the part of healthcare providers. Sentinel events are closely investigated by healthcare regulatory authorities to identify root causes and implement corrective actions to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
 There are 58 total types of sentinel events, with the most prevalent being:
 Falls (48%)

 Wrong site surgery (8%)

 Unintended retention of foreign object (8%)

 Assault/rape/sexual assault/homicide (8%)

 Delay in treatment (6%)

 Suicide (5%)

 Check out the below data chart from the Joint Commissions 2023 review of sentinel events which shows a steep rise in sentinel events concurrent with the roll out of the mRNA platform (obviously other factors likely contribute but the temporal association should give serious pause):

 Now, before I go through the major sentinel events, I found this sentence in the beginning of the report:
 “As the reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary, no conclusions should be drawn about the actual relative frequency of events or trends in events over time.
 That sentence reminds me of the U.S. Society of Actuaries report where they also cautioned against making any conclusions regarding the temporal relationship of the massive rise in life insurance claims with the rollout of the mRNA platform and/or mandates as I discussed in a previous post here . The Joint Commission’s statement above is as absurd when you look at the chart - sentinel event reports are remarkably stable from 2013-2020 and then shoot up dramatically starting only in 2021 (and remain high).
 So, what sentinel events drove this rapid rise?
 Answer: FALLS!

 Contrary to my original hypothesis, there really isn’t much of a signal supporting an increase in physician errors in the above data. Delay in treatment can be explained by Covid surges and staffing issues (from mandates), but, at the risk of cherry picking data, I highlighted “Wrong Site Surgery” as being problematic in 2021 even though it was less than 2019. The reason I highlighted this is that a “wrong site surgery” is truly supposed to be a “never event” and many systems and processes have been put into place to avoid this happening over the past decade. Thus I felt the sudden rise in 2021 concerning. It also rose again by a large amount in 2023. But, since both were lower than in 2019, I cant make a strong argument with this data except to say these should be consistently decreasing year by year but they are not.
 But the real issue to discuss is.. falls. The average number of falls in 2019 and 2020 nearly tripled in 2021 and then became a quadruple of the pre-mRNA campaign rate in 2022 and 2023. Admittedly this can be from increasing cognitive impairment of patients but also likely represents less monitoring/care/training of nurses (issues which were discussed in my previous post here ). But the real shock is what the Joint Commission wrote in their report:
 Conclusion: Reported sentinel events remained consistent with previous reporting patterns. Consistent with previous years, patient falls were the leading event type reviewed (48%).
 I found the above statement overtly misleading in that although yes, the highest percentage of sentinel events were falls in “previous years.” if you look below to see what percent were falls prior to the jab campaign - only 18-21%. Now they are almost 50% and the absolute number of falls reported has skyrocketed.

 I think the Joint Commission headline and conclusion should have been “Alarming Increase in Patient Falls In U.S Hospitals (since the mRNA campaign)” or, to be less inflammatory, “since 2021”. I cannot emphasize how serious this change is. First off, know that historically 3% of all hospital patients fall and 30% of those patients suffer injury.
 From the Joint Commission Report:

 26 deaths from falling in a hospital? 56 falls resulted in permanent harm and 538 resulted in severe harm?
 Why is there not a big national push to prevent falls in hospitals if they have suddenly risen at such an acute and unprecedented rate? This metric, in my mind, is literally screaming that hospitals are now much more dangerous places given they are unable to prevent falls among the patients they take care of. Again from the report:
 Consistent with 2022, patient falls while ambulating was the leading mechanism for falling followed by falling from bed and falling while toileting. Reported contributors to falls included policies not being followed (e.g., fall risk assessment), lack of competency to recognize abnormal clinical signs or signals, inadequate staff-to-staff communication during handoffs or transitions of care, and lack of shared understanding or mental model regarding plan of care.
 I found it interesting that they highlighted only causes related to poor monitoring, communication, and care by staff when there are numerous other contributors that are more patient driven, like:
 unfamiliar settings

 medicines that cause dizziness and confusion.

 illness, tests and treatments that make you weak and unsteady on your feet.

 lack of activity/weakness

 I disagree with the Joint Commission’s position that you can not compare rates over time because reporting is “voluntary.” I would agree with them if they could provide either data or a rationale that could explain why “voluntary reporting” of falls suddenly skyrocketed in 2021 and that increase was maintained in 2022 and 2023. Was there a big public push to health care institutions and employees to report more sentinel events or falls specifically? They certainly did not provide evidence of that and further, such dramatic increases did not happen for any other sentinel event type.
 Unlike JCAHO, I would argue that this sudden and massive drop in the quality of care hospitals provide is a major issue that should be addressed in a systematic, public manner. Is a Congressional hearing warranted?
 Even if the data was not consistent with an increase in falls but rather an increase in reporting, wouldn’t you want to confirm that or rule it out before simply ignoring the signal that falls are a new and major issue in hospitals? My cynicism and lack of trust in how our "authorities” confront inconvenient data knows no bounds at this point and this is yet another example.
 During my “system” career, I saw that nurses were heavily focused on preventing falls, by doing risk assessments and assigning 1:1 observation of patients with paid “companions” for those at high risk of falls etc. Patient falls were a big deal for everyone involved, chief among them obviously was the patient injured or who often had to get a CT scan of the head or X-rays of the hips to rule out serious injury. But falls are major issue for nurses. A patient fall is like the worst thing for hospital quality data and for the record of the nurse in charge of the patient, yet we suddenly started losing the war against patient falls? And badly too.
 Ultimately, although I could not find robust data supporting an increase in overall physician errors or complaints (yet?), the data on falls in hospitals is truly alarming. I believe is reflects an alarming drop in the quality of hospital care due to the training and competence of nurses and/or their cognitive abilities in the wake of the mRNA campaign. To think that the Joint Commission is not raising an alarm because these data are “voluntary” is both inappropriate and nonsensical. Why wouldn’t you start investigating the issue using the hypothesis that reporting of falls has increased because falls have increased and not because quality reporters are suddenly and inexplicably more willing to report falls? Clown world again.
 Either way, if I had a loved one in the hospital at risk of a fall, I would make sure a family member or friend was with them at all times or as much as possible.

 I just want to say thanks to all my subscribers, especially the paid ones! Your support is greatly appreciated as it allows me to devote what is often large amounts of time in researching and writing my posts, so again, thanks. - Pierre
 Subscribe now
 P.S.For anyone in need of complementary treatment for cancer (note we are one of the sites for the repurposed drug study described here) or for Long Covid, Long Vax, Hormone Rebalancing, Weight Loss or General Medical Care, feel free to visit the Leading Edge Tele-Health Clinic where we see patients in all 50 states. Looking at the photo below, I just realized our staff is a lot bigger now - we just added our 20th employee!

 P.P.S I hope to see you all this weekend in Ocala, Florida for Dr. John Littel’s 4th Annual Covid Summit! Info below:

Summary: In a three day span, I was told by four different patients of errors made by both physicians and nurses that harmed them, ranging from the catastrophic to the concerning.