mRNA Vaccine Shedding Of Spike Protein: State Of the Scientific and Clinical Evidence

My readers may recall my initial nine-part series on mRNA vaccine shedding from November. Since that time, I have devoted even more effort in researching this topic in collaboration with fellow researcher, friend, and colleague, A Midwestern Doctor (AMD).
 Of the now innumerable fraudulent claims supporting the global Covid mRNA vaccine campaign, the risks and reality of the shedding of spike protein which then can cause adverse effect symptoms in those exposed to vaccinated individuals is one of the most disturbing.
 That is saying a lot given what we now know of the fraudulent manipulation of the original trials, the subsequent explosion and ignoring of VAERS reports, the near universal DNA contamination of Moderna and Pfizer vials, the explosions in life insurance claims, especially among young people, the massive impacts on menstruation and fertility, and now the spikes in excess mortality rippling across both this country and much of the world.
 Shedding is in a different category however, because here, the adverse effects of the mRNA vaccines are now being felt by people who chose to protect themselves by refusing to receive an experimental gene therapy injection. Despite their justified prudence, an as yet unquantifiable number of people are getting sick from being exposed to the vaccinated. This is an even more shocking example of the violations of informed consent and bodily autonomy that we have already witnessed around the global mRNA vaccine campaign
 It was AMD’s idea that we put out several public calls for reports of shedding beyond the deluge that my original series received . We now have over 1,200 such reports (h ere is where you should submit new reports in the comments section). AMD painstakingly reviewed and organized the data from these reports and wrote an excellent section on clinical guidance. This section not only cites numerous clinical reports but also provides general guidance in how to protect yourself and control symptoms if you are susceptible to shedding
 In that report, we concluded that mRNA vaccine “shedding” of spike protein is real based on evidence from regulatory and industry documents, basic science experiments, vaccine studies and and clinical reports. Although many of my readers may have waded through my prior, lengthy 9-part series on shedding, the new report is more concise and navigable.
 A PDF report with a clickable Table of Contents can be found on the FLCCC website here . Please share with all interested. For those more time-challenged, in the below, I provide a short summary of the “Key Scientific Findings” that we relied upon to support the unfortunate reality of mRNA gene therapy product shedding.

 Support in the form of paid subscriptions is greatly appreciated and will help further support the large amounts of time I have put and will continue to put into this research.
 Subscribe now

 OVERVIEW OF THE SCIENCE OF mRNA VACCINE SHEDDING
 A quick summary of the scientific case we have built is as follows:
 COVID mRNA “vaccines” are gene therapy products as defined in the FDA’s 2015 document on Gene Product Shedding Studies .

  “ Gene therapy products are all products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome and that are administered as nucleic acids, viruses, or genetically engineered microorganisms.

 The FDA document defines shedding of gene therapy products as:
  “ The release of viral or bacterial gene therapy products from the patient by any or all of the following routes: feces (feces); secretions (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.); or through the skin (pustules, lesions, sores).”

 All other gene therapy products on the market list shedding as a risk in their insert (Luxterna, Roctavian, Zolgensma) and shed from 7 days to 6 months

 Pfizer was aware of the risks of shedding and specifically stated in their protocol that study investigators collect reports of environmental shedding events (trial protocol p. 67)

 The mRNA vaccines are also defined as “nanoparticle technology” which can be synthetic or biologic (i.e. exosomes). Synthetic nanoparticles distribute widely in the body and easily traverse numerous physiologic barriers (most notably can be inhaled and absorbed by the lungs)

 mRNA gene therapy products (spike protein) have then been found in circulating exosomes for up to 187 days after vaccination (after which study was stopped). Note that exosomes can be easily transmitted via the breath, and absorbed into the lungs of those nearby.

 Data from Dr. Burkharts autopsy series (and cases reports) show widely disseminated spike in numerous organs after vaccination

 Breast Milk shedding : Numerous animal and human studies report mRNA and/or spike protein in breast milk after vaccination.
 Pfizer post-surveillance data contain numerous reports of breast fed babies suffering anaphylaxis, strokes, seizures, and respiratory arrest after a feeding.

 Placental shedding - synthetic nanoparticle and exosomes readily cross the placental barrier. A recent paper found both mRNA and spike protein within the placentas of two mothers vaccinated shortly before delivery.
 The CDC recommends investigation into any VAERS adverse event with a “Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) compared to the influenza vaccine which is greater than 2. There are now 11 pregnancy and fetal adverse effects reported to VAERS with PRR’s ranging from 3 to 300.

 Person-to-Person Shedding - one study reported unvaccinated children of vaccinated parents developed antibodies to spike protein. Another study found that excess mortality of unvaccinated children in the USA and Europe increased during the first 18 weeks after the adult vaccination campaign rollout (i..e at a time when children were NOT being vaccinated).
 Two groups of researchers, one including myself and AMD put out a public call for shedding reports. We now have over a 1,000 reports which are:
 repeatable and predictable

 evenly split between people who reported a cluster of symptoms vs. a single symptom

 submitted by people who reported symptoms that matched what many others reported

 Patterns Of Shedding Reported:
 Primary: when someone gets ill from being around a vaccinated person (e.g. vaccinated parents making their unvaccinated children ill )

 Secondary: when someone gets ill from being around a person who was recently around vaccinated people, (e.g., children being shed upon and then affecting parents after coming back home from school).

 Susceptible Patients
 Sensitivity to shedding varies immensely and generally only affects environmentally or physiologically sensitive people

 Symptoms resemble what is seen in other spike protein-induced syndromes (e.g., long COVID/long Vax).

 Patients develop similar symptoms after a shedding exposure , particularly after a “strong” shedding exposure

 Many patients reported repeated shedding symptoms emerge after the same exposure

 Characteristics of “Shedders”
 dramatically more likely to shed soon after vaccination (the very sensitive claim they are susceptible far beyond a 2-4 week period)

 shedding events (in the same location) are the most frequent and severe immediately following a new booster rollout

 young and healthy people tend to shed more frequently

 shedding greatly varies by the individual (e.g., “ I react to specific people I see at church ”).

 Most Common Symptoms: Menstrual abnormalities (by far), Decidual Cast shedding, Headaches, Tinnitus, Nosebleeds, Painless, inexplicable bruising, Dizziness, Brain Fog/Malaise, Skin Rashes

 Less Common Symptoms: Atrial Fibrillation/palpitations, Muscle Pain, Seizures, Peripheral Neuropathy, Insomnia, Hair Loss, Swollen Lymph Nodes, Severe abdominal pain, Sinus Pressure/Copious discharge, Vision/Eye Problems

 Rare Symptoms: Stroke, Blood clots, Severe heart injuries in children, Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Death, Cancers, Sensory Neuropathy, Anxiety

 CLINICAL GUIDANCE
 First and foremost, we believe it is critical to not publicly espouse divisive ideas (e.g., “purebloods” vs. those who were vaccinated) that prevent the public from becoming united and impactful. The vaccines were marketed on the basis of division (e.g., by encouraging immense discrimination against the unvaccinated), and many unvaccinated individuals thus understandably hold a lot of resentment for how the vaccinated treated them. We do not want to perpetuate anything similar (e.g., discrimination in the other direction). Likewise, we don’t want to create any more unnecessary fear — which is an inevitable consequence of opening up a conversation about shedding.
 Nonetheless, while we do not believe you should be greatly concerned about shedding if it has not yet affected you, we do believe those being harmed by it need to be aware of it and should be treated with compassion and respect rather than being dismissed and ridiculed.
 Protection Strategies: What can be done to mitigate the effects of shedding that cannot be avoided?
 Many of the approaches for doing this should be evident at this point. For example, a key purpose of this document was to help people identify if they were at an increased risk for being harmed by shedding, and if so (which we do not believe applies to the majority of readers), to encourage them to avoid situations with a high degree of shedding. In addition, we believe the following options have a lot of merit:
 Take an effective proteolytic enzyme. Nattokinase along with Bromelain is the most popular option currently available (although some practitioners feel there are more potent and effective products on the market). If it seems like you need it (e.g., you know you are sensitive to shedding), consider taking ivermectin to neutralize and bind the spike protein. Unfortunately, there are a cohort of spike protein injured patients who do not have a dramatic response to ivermectin, and likewise with shedding, some individuals who are exposed to shedding notice ivermectin is life-changing for them, while others aren’t sure if it helps.

 Another commonly utilized spike protein binding and breakdown agent is the augmented NAC product from the non-profit group called Zero Spike.

 Some patients are now using a nicotine patch protocol which we do not like as we’ve seen a number of patients that had bad reactions and nicotine is addictive (and vasoconstrictive) but nonetheless it does help some patients. NADXL patches may be a safer and as effective alternative.

 Additionally quite a few people have benefitted from a zeta potential restoration protocol . Others have had success with curcumin (unfortunately there is immense variability in the quality of curcumin supplements), Vitamin D, quercetin, and hydroxycholoroquine (while others have tried these approaches without success).

 We don’t feel in most cases any of the above are actually needed, because typically “shedding sickness” seems to recover on its own once you are no longer around the shedder, although there have been a number of exceptions to this.

 Sexual Partners:
 What do we currently know about shedding and sexual relationships? Both the degree of shedding and the susceptibility to shedding vary greatly, so this will probably be the deciding factor if you want to pursue a relationship with a vaccinated individual (e.g., if you know you are fairly sensitive you have no choice, whereas if you are less sensitive you can first test if you react to the individual). Since the unvaccinated dating pool is very small, this situation creates a significant dilemma for those entering the dating market.
 Presently our thoughts are as follows:
 1) One benefit is that unvaccinated individuals are more likely to be in alignment with your worldview.
 2) The website unjected.com is specifically designed for unvaccinated singles to meet each other. Although we think it’s a good idea in principle, it is too costly for many.
 3) It is important to go slow with new partners, both so they can understand you are serious about the vaccine (so they won’t boost behind your back and hence expose you to a high vaccine dose) and so you can see how you react to them (e.g., can you tolerate having your mouth be close to theirs. It may be necessary to avoid direct contact with their semen.
 4) It is highly likely as time goes forward, more and more people will lie and claim they were never vaccinated, so it will be important to be able to recognize if someone has a body you react to.
 5) Many who can tell who is “shedding” have told me they’ve lost their attraction to potential vaccinated partners, so this all may also work itself out on its own.
 Blood Supply
 What do we currently know about shedding and blood transfusions from vaccinated individuals? Another common concern we have repeatedly seen raised is if the blood supply is “safe,” and in turn more calls than I can count to create an unvaccinated blood bank for those who were not vaccinated. We think that as long as the health agencies refuse to acknowledge the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, this will never become a reality given how tightly regulated the blood supply is.
 The idea that you could create a separate blood bank that hospitals would then be willing to use is unlikely (e.g., consider how far New Zealand’s government went to prevent it from being done on a one-off basis). Fortunately, we believe vaccinated blood injuries are quite rare (although they have occurred), to the point many of them may have been by chance and not related to the actual transfusion.
 To be more specific, we know of three cases, (two here and here, and the third is a patient of Dr. Kory’s, whose history of illness clearly implicated a transfusion). Further, when Steve Kirsch broached the transfusion subject to approximately 200,000 readers and received 568 comments, we did not find mention of a transfusion injury story.
 However, more concerning is that one commenter on an article of Dr. Kory’s came from a hematologist who stated: “I have seen some unusually severe reactions to RBC transfusions in the past couple years, including a couple that led to pressors/ventilator support. I have wondered if these patients received spike protein containing blood from jabbed donors.”
 In line with the above is that in an article on reports from a nurse colleague of Dr. Kory’s, she stated that the hospital was struggling to get enough blood donations from the staff given they had seen so many vaccine injuries in their patients they allegedly felt their blood was tainted and hence weren’t comfortable giving it.
 In this article, AMD explores more deeply the mechanisms in which vaccinated blood could potentially make someone acutely ill, however, based on the likely mechanisms, we feel that if people acutely react to a blood transfusion, it’s most likely due to them receiving a transfusion from someone who had recently been vaccinated. This can be prevented by telling people not to donate for a few weeks after vaccination — something the Red Cross already does for the J&J vaccine or if you do not know what COVID vaccine you received.
 That all being said, while we do not believe you should be particularly concerned about the vaccinated blood supply, several approaches can be taken to protect yourself:
 1) Hospitals will normally let you donate your own blood ahead of time, which can then be transfused into to you if it’s needed during an elective (non-emergency) surgery.
 2) Certain drugs allow you to increase your red blood cell concentration. In turn, there is quite a bit of evidence that taking them prior to a surgery with a high amount of expected blood loss reduces the need for the patient to receive blood transfusions.
 3) To some extent, blood loss can be compensated for by receiving saline (which dilutes your blood but preserves the total blood volume), followed by either iron infusions (typically done) or chlorophyl consumption (much less known about) to raise your hemoglobin count (e.g., see this trial).
 4) The amount of blood loss that occurs during surgeries varies depending on the skill (and finesse) of a surgeon. Because of this, you can likely reduce your need for blood transfusions if you pick the right surgeon to work with.
 5) Technologies exist to recycle blood that is lost during a surgery so it can be transfused back into the patient (e.g., the Cell Saver) and when studied, appear to work. Since your own blood is recycled this can bypass the need for a transfusion. In turn, certain surgical facilities offer this option to their patients.
 6) Avoid transfusions as much as possible because other contaminants exist in the blood supply and there is quite a bit of data showing repeated transfusions can cause a variety of health issues. Unfortunately, if you have an emergency situation (e.g., a severe accident) it is unlikely any of these will be viable to do. Fortunately, those situations are rare, and likewise, we believe vaccine injuries from blood transfusions are also very rare.
 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
 When you consider the liability from the vaccine injuries and deaths as well as the harm they have created to those who were unvaccinated, there is a massive degree of legal liability, something along the lines of a “too big to fail” situation. In such situations, governments almost always default to protecting the criminals (e.g., consider the trillions both Bush and Obama gave the banks) rather than punishing them to ensure this does not happen again.
 Conversely, the one bright side we see to all of this is that shedding may open up a new avenue of legal attack for lawsuits since this is an unusual situation the blanket liability shield the vaccine manufacturers enjoy may not apply to. Additionally, if it can be proven that a significant number of people are sensitive to shedding, the American Disabilities Act (or OSHA’s requirement to create a safe work environment for workers) may require facilities to protect those sensitive to shedding (e.g., by instructing recently boosted individuals to avoid the facility — which will effectively remove any remaining willingness to take the boosters (which has already rapidly waned).
 Know that a Miami school adopted a policy restricting the recently vaccinated from entering in July of 2021. Furthermore, David Gorski (whose blog strongly supports vaccine mandates) has understandably gotten quite upset that businesses might do the opposite and instead discriminate against the vaccinated. In turn, Gorski kindly created a compilation of many other businesses that followed in the Miami school’s footsteps and “banned” recently vaccinated 27 individuals. This, in turn, indicates there is a precedent for private businesses protecting their employees and customers from shedding.
 CONCLUSION
 We hope you found this review helpful — it’s been a long journey to complete this (especially since it will need to be periodically updated as we receive more feedback). When reading it, we hope you were not overly disturbed by its contents and import. We are presently working with a lot of unknowns, so we have tried our best to provide the most critical information in the most responsible fashion possible.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This article was compiled with the help of the prolific research by my colleague who goes by the pseudonym A Midwestern Doctor. Their Substack is here.

 P.S I just want to say thanks to all my subscribers, especially the paid ones! Your financial support is greatly appreciated as it allows me to devote what is often large amounts of the limited time that I have available to spend researching and writing my posts, so again, thanks. - Pierre
 Subscribe now
 P.P.S - Proud to report that my book is gaining Best Seller status on Amazon in several countries and is climbing up the U.S Amazon rankings. *If any of you have read it, I would love if you could post an honest review!

Summary: I compiled a concise, organized, and referenced document detailing the scientific and clinical evidence that spike protein shedding causes side efects in a cohort of people exposed to the vaccinated.


All along the watchtower

Majestic Baobab Trees

 Thanks for reading Lightning Bug! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

 PAST
 When I was in seventh grade, we moved to the sticks. Our home was across the road from a state game preserve, which was literally swamplands. We had no cable, and the primary source of heat was a big woodstove to which I dedicated many hours, stacking wood, carrying wood inside, starting fires in the morning, and keeping the fire burning during the day. The bus stop after school was a quarter mile from our house down a gravel and oil road. We didn’t have Atari and my parents worked. There was only so much trouble to get into.
 The single TV channel we could get carried The Rockford Files with James Garner, and so my slacker afterschool routine was to grab a big mug of Lipton instant tea, a bag of pretzels, and plop down on the worn sofa by the wood stove to watch. I’m really not sure it’s fair to call the sugary mixture tea, as it bears so little resemblance to the real stuff. But I loved the salty sweet yeasty flavors of fake tea and pretzels, and couldn’t get enough of Jim Rockford’s misadventures.
 Years before the handsome Tom Selleck played Magnum PI, James Garner won my heart. Magmum PI lived the cushy life in a Hawaiian guest house and rolled in a red Ferrari. Rockford was the cranky antihero who drove 1974-1978 model year Pontiac Firebirds , was a wrongly convicted ex-con, and lived with his dad Rocky in a trailer. He got beat up more often than not.
 My favorite scene ever was when Rockford flipped his cigarette into the face of a thug. It was supposed to be a distraction, enabling him to land a punch and escape. Instead, the thug didn’t miss a beat and knocked Rockford off his block. It’s not that I liked seeing my guy get beat up. It’s more that I felt validated, like, “Yeah, you think you’ve got it figured out and it never goes the way you imagined. Blam!”
 RECENT PAST
 My Nana took tea to the next level. She would brew half a dozen bags of Lipton orange pekoe tea for-ev-er on the stovetop in a gallon pot whose sole duty was tea time. Then she would dump a little can of frozen lemonade in and voila! Iced tea Marsland-style.
 In my late twenties I would make fun of my friend Brett and his tea habits. He wouldn’t be caught drinking tea made with a tea bag. In his cupboard were special decorative cans from Kusmi Tea with names like Prince Vladmir. He had a special tea pot which heated water to just the right temperature for a particular tea, AND he had a timer to brew it for a specified time. It all seemed so precious and pretentious, and I figured, well, unless you were English or a metrosexual, a bag of Lipton was adequate.
 Fast forward twenty five years and I think that Brett could make fun of me! In the top drawer of my work desk I have a thermometer and a tea strainer. Teabag tea tastes like cardboard to me now, and there is a time and a temperture for all: two minutes for Sencha, three for green, four for black, and five for Pu’er. 160F for green, 170F for Matcha (and a whisk don’t you know), boiling hot for black. And no burned tongue for me, as it won’t pass my lips until it’s cooled to 140F. Rishi Tea , the largest American importer of organic teas became my go-to supplier.
 With the pandemic, green tea went beyond yumminess to essential equipment for survival. I was working evenings at SUNY Upstate in the trauma center, and the drive home at 12:30am was 1 1/2 hours of bleak, cold, darkness. I calculated that I could start sipping upon departure and stay awake on the road, then drink a big glass of water upon arrival home and wash out the caffeine. It wasn’t until I joined Pierre at The Leading Edge Clinic and began learning how to fight COVID, then treat post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) and vaccine injury that I realized how important that green tea had been.
 There are multiple studies now which demonstrate how the epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in green tea blocks spike entry into cells. See studies here , there and everywhere . It turns out that after spending hours providing bedside care to sweating, coughing, distressed acute COVID patients, that green tea was not only keeping me awake on the drive home, it was also blocking spike from taking hold in my body.
 PRESENT
 All Along the Watchtower by Bob Dylan, made famous by Jimi Hendrix:
 There must be some kind of way outta here
Said the joker to the thief
There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief
 Business men, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None will level on the line
Nobody offered his word
Hey, hey
 No reason to get excited
The thief, he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But, uh, but you and I, we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us stop talkin' falsely now
The hour's getting late, hey
 If you’ve read this far, let me reward your curiosity and tenacity by introducing you to Baobab. After eight months of personal and patients’ use, tracking labs and monitoring clinical effect, I think it is some kind of way out of the confusion, and none too soon.
 Baobab is a tree which covers half the continent of Africa. It dates back to biblical times, and was important to tribal people in arid desert regions, because both its hollow core and spongy bark could store water. It is an odd looking tree, which produces a large fruit the size of a football, which has a hard shell. When ripe, the fruit is a dry powder which can be mechanically separated from fiber and seeds. Every single part of the tree is useful to humans and animals alike. The leaves can provide forage for wild animals and livestock, the bark can be made into rope, the wood used for fuel, and the fruit for medicinal purposes. For these reasons it is often referred to as The Tree of Life.
 Before there were words for these actions, Baobab fruit was antibiotic, antiviral, antifungal, antipyretic (fever lowering), and poison neutralizing. Tribespeople who hunt with poison tipped arrows and spears will mix Baobab powder with water to apply to the entry wound and neutralize the poison so that they can eat the flesh. Baobob has a pre-biotic fiber which modulates glucose metabolism, thus lowering fasting blood glucose levels. The fiber also creates a welcoming environment for an abundant and diverse population of bifida bacteria in the gut.
 Baobab also has EGCG.
 Last Spring, Pierre was at a conference in Hawaii and I was covering some of his patients. It was serendipity that I saw the labs come back for a family which had decided to measure the spike antibody for everyone in the household. Mom, college-age daughter and high school-age daughter were unvaccinated, with spike antibody (ab) levels of ~7,000, 3500 and 1500 U/mL respectively. Dad is a physician working in a busy outpatient clinic. He received two Pfizer shots, both from bad batches, and was exposed to ongoing shedding while delivering patient care in a healthcare environment. His spike ab was about 100 U/mL. I was stunned, and understood that this was either a lab error or a very intriguing aberration.
 I picked up the phone and called this family, speaking with the mom at length. Dad didn’t take any medications, nor did he take any supplements. In fact, it took about thirty minutes to uncover what he could possibly be doing which would result in such a low spike ab level. Finally she said, “Well, there is this drink he makes every morning and takes to work. It has Baobab powder, and he mixes it with stevia and ginger. He only drinks it during the week, and sips it over the course of the day.” Why Baobab I asked? “It has a lot of vitamin C, and pre-biotics, but I’m not really sure. He’s been drinking it for years.” I thanked her and hung up, then spent the next four hours reading papers about Baobab.
 As I read about Baobab’s many qualities , and then learned that it had EGCG, I concluded that the Baobab was somehow connected to this physician’s low spike ab level. He was patient 0. Researchers had considered Baobab to control COVID , but as far as I could tell, hadn’t pursued it further. I pulled $500 out of my piggy bank, messaged twenty patients whose spike ab levels were >25,000 U/mL or relatively high, and made them a proposal. Eat, drink, sip, but one way or the other get 1 Tbsp of Baobab in your body every day for a month, and then let’s recheck your spike ab level.
 Within the month the feedback started to roll in, and I had my own experience to contribute. I started drinking the Baobab with my morning vitamins. That didn’t go so well, because I ended up with increased paresthesias (decreased sensation) in my toes and feet. After hearing the same story from three other participants in the pilot study, I suggested that we all sip it over the course of the day, like patient 0. The paresthesias resolved.
 When the spike ab results started to come back after a month of Baobab, there was a signal. If patients ate it or drank it, there was a slight change in their levels. But if they sipped it, boy howdy! There were drops in spike ab levels reaching 5,000 U/mL over a month. That was enough for me, and I began guiding patients to sip Baobab, 1 Tbsp in 16oz of water over at least an eight hour period.
 More feedback with additional patients revealed a few quirks of the therapy. If someone has severe mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), they may need to go low and slow. Well, just about all of our patients have some level of mast cell activation, so I guided everyone to start with adding only 1/4 teaspoon to 16oz of water and slowly advancing. Initially, some patients (including me) experienced some bloating while sipping Baobab. I’ll attribute this to the recalibration of our microbiomes as we build up the bifida.
 Labs in patients who were sipping Baobab showed a declining fasting glucose, similar to what we see when we use Berberine. Patients also report enormous formed brown stools with a clean finish, i.e. no wiping necessary, and a sensation of complete bowel evacuation. Gotta love that.
 Then things got interesting. We have been treating patients for microclotting for over a year now, and so some patients were beginning to retest. What I saw was multiple signals that unvaccinated PASC patients who were sipping Baobab dropped their microclotting scores by two points in 2-3 months. For reference, it often takes six months on anticoagulation with Aspirin, Eliquis and Plavix for a PASC or vaccine injured patient to drop his/her/their score one point. It would appear that not only does Baobab block spike entry into cells, but also that it helps break down microclots faster and safely. How?
 The likely answer arrived a few weeks ago when I was reading a review article about natural products for antithrombosis . I learned that EGCG acts along the COX-1 pathway, same as Aspirin, to inhibit platelet aggregation and activation. Whereas Aspirin has about a 20% effect, EGCG has about a 90% effect.
 Why not just take EGCG then? Well, you could. But any herbalist worth his/her/their salt would explain that when you isolate an active component of a plant-based remedy, you leave behind other components which synergize and ameliorate adverse effects. Given what I have seen clinically over the last eight months, my vote is to stick with green tea and Baobab sipping.
 Where do you get Baobab? There are plenty of sources online if you want to shop around, as Baobab is an agricultural product.
 How do you mix it? If you can make gravy without lumps, you can mix Baobab. I usually start the day by slowly tapping one Tbsp of Baobab into a cup of water as I stir it with a spoon. I smush out any remaining lumps, and then add this to a thermos with cold water, shaking and sipping every half hour over the course of the day. Every time I talk to a patient about Baobab, I take a sip!
 What does it taste like? I would describe Baobab as having a mild citrus flavor. If it doesn’t agree with you, feel free to flavor it like patient 0. A few patients have complained that it has given them heartburn, and there have been others who can’t be bothered with the fuss and muss of mixing/sipping. My position it this: Baobab costs about $20 for a 1 1/2 month supply, blocks spike, breaks down microclots, builds up my bifida, lowers my fasting glucose, doesn’t taste too bad, and helps me have a very satisfying poop every day. Sold!
 Baobab sipping is an economical way to combat shedding. My suggestion is to prepare your Baobab sipper before you head into any social interaction. Start sipping ahead of time, sip during the event, and continue sipping afterwards. In effect you are delivering a steady supply of EGCG and whatever synergy we haven’t yet isolated in a lab, which is blocking spike entry into your cells. If you are going to travel, bring the powder with you and once you are through airport security, mix it up at the water fountain and get down to sipping. Our patients and team have been doing this for months, and overall the results have been positive.
 Cheers!
 P.S. If you have ever seen a Guardians of the Galaxy movie, you can appreciate the power of a groovy soundtrack . My wife and I really enjoyed the updated series of Battlestar Galactica, and I’ll never forget when Jimi Hendrix’s anthem showed up in the narrative. Five main characters keep hearing the song in their head, and end up together in the same rom where they realize they are the Final Five Cylons. Internet wisdom says: “The song's biblical and mythical connections make it fitting for the show, as it foreshadows destruction and leads to a new world.”
 P.S.S. I have no financial stake in any of the products I recommend, including Rishi Tea.
 Thanks for reading Lightning Bug! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Summary: Rockford Files, green tea, and Baobab


What We've Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports
Please share yours as well so we can unravel this mystery
A Midwestern Doctor
Jan 08, 2024
875
2,025
152
Share
Cross-posted by
The Forgotten Side of Medicine
"This weekend, I presented what we now know about shedding injuries to a packed audience at the annual FLCCC conference in Phoenix. Much of this has been made possible by the remarkable work of my colleague AMD and over 1,000 people sharing their shedding experiences with us. Please read the below article from AMD and consider sharing your shedding experiences as well.  We need to amass the evidence to prove this is a critical issue that must be taken seriously."
-
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
Story at a Glance:
•After the COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, stories began emerging of unvaccinated individuals becoming ill after being in proximity to recently vaccinated individuals. This confused many, as the mRNA technology in theory should not be able to “shed.”
•At this point, we believe this is a real phenomenon as we have seen numerous patient cases which can only be explained by mRNA shedding.
•Some of the most frequent questions about shedding include: “how much do I need to consider mRNA shedding when dating?” “is vaccinated blood safe?” “how do I protect myself from shedding?” and “what are the potential mechanisms that could explain how shedding is possible?”
•In this article, we will present everything we currently know about shedding (e.g., the evidence for it, who tends to shed, who is affected by shedding, what symptoms are typically observed after shedding).  Much of this has been made possible by the hundreds of individuals who have shared their shedding experiences—if you can, please share your story too.
Note: after publishing the original article, it received a lot of feedback (e.g.,
a tweet about it
received over 500,000 views).  This is a significantly revised version of the previous article which takes into account what has been learned since then.  Over the next month, I will continue revising it as we receive more shedding reports.
When doctors in this movement speak at events about the vaccines, by far the most common question they receive is “is vaccine shedding real?”
This is understandable as COVID vaccine shedding (becoming ill from vaccinated individuals) represents the one way the unvaccinated are also at risk from the vaccines and hence still need to be directly concerned about them.
Simultaneously, this is a difficult question to answer for a few key reasons.
First and foremost, we believe it is critical to not publicly espouse divisive ideas (e.g., “PureBloods” vs. those who were vaccinated) that prevent the public from coming together and helping everyone.  The vaccines were marketed on the basis of division (e.g., by encouraging immense discrimination against the unvaccinated), and many unvaccinated individuals thus understandably hold a lot of resentment for how the vaccinated treated them. We do not want to perpetuate anything similar (e.g., discrimination in the other direction).
Likewise, we don’t want to create any more unnecessary fear—which is an inevitable consequence of opening up a conversation about shedding.
Finally, in theory, shedding with the mRNA vaccines should be “impossible.”  Because of this, stating it’s real puts anyone who does so in a very awkward position.
That being said, from having looked into this extensively, I am relatively sure of the following:
1. Shedding is very real.
2. People’s sensitivity to it
greatly
varies.
3. Most of the people who are highly sensitive to shedding have already figured it out, so if you do not already believe it is an issue for you, you probably don’t need to worry about it.
4. There is still no agreed upon mechanism to explain why it happens.
For all of these reasons, we would greatly appreciated if you could share your shedding experiences (hundreds already have).  Those stories are being collected in
the comments section of this article.
The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The Mechanistic Trap
In
the previous article
(which provides important context for the ideas laid forth in this one) I discussed the habitual tendency of science to reject observations which have no mechanism that could explain how they are happening.  In turn, I argued this was problematic as it results in many critically important observations being dismissed since their “mechanism” lies outside the existing scientific paradigm.
One of the most common ways this happens is for logical arguments to be put together which assert the observation cannot be real.  In some cases, the argument is quite compelling, while in others (provided you understand the subject) it’s actually ridiculous.
For example, since the mRNA vaccines were an experimental gene therapy, one of the immediate fears people had about them (myself included) was that they would permanently alter your DNA.
To address this, countless articles were written which ridiculed that notion.  This was done by repeating a few logical arguments which sounded nice and were deemed to be “true” because the “experts” had espoused them (e.g. consider these frequently cited pronouncements by
Paul Offit
and
Anthony Fauci
).  Those arguments were as follows:
1. The vaccines cannot enter the nucleus of the cell
2. mRNA from the vaccines breaks down rapidly in the cell, so it does not have time to enter the nucleus and change your DNA.
3. mRNA is not DNA, and hence believing mRNA can change DNA represents a fundamental lack of knowledge of biology.
On the surface, that train of logic effectively “refutes” the DNA alteration hypothesis.  However, in reality, each of the above premises was false or highly misleading (e.g., the mRNA was designed to resist being broken down so it could remain active for a prolonged period).
Note: a more detailed explanation of why those premises were wrong can be found in my contribution
to this article
which discussed how mRNA spike protein vaccines alters DNA.  Additionally, Robert Malone recently
wrote a more detailed critique
of Offit doubling down on a related claim (that DNA contaminants in the vaccines cannot affect our DNA).
Conversely, I felt that since assessing genetic toxicity was both a pivotal requirement for new pharmaceutical products and it was easy to predict genetic toxicity would be one of the top concerns with the mRNA vaccines, there was no possible way it wasn’t tested for by Pfizer and Moderna at the very start.  Yet, in all the articles refuting the DNA alternation hypothesis, none of that data was ever shared and instead we simply received logical arguments with no data behind them.
Note: leaked EMA documents likewise revealed that for some reason,
the drug regulators were not provided with any genotoxicity data by Pfizer
.
In my eyes, this suggested DNA alteration had been found, and that Pfizer decided its best option was to simply avoid mentioning that data while simultaneously claiming there was “no evidence of DNA alteration” (which is a common tactic industry uses to bury science which threatens its bottom line).  In turn, I can’t say I was particularly surprised when independent research conducted long after the vaccine hit the market
discovered the vaccine indeed can change the DNA of a cell
.
Note:
in a recent article
, I discussed how no one has been willing to make the raw data of the health outcomes in those who were vaccinated become available.  While a lot of excuses have been made for why this hasn’t happened, like many, I believe the actual reason is because that data shows the vaccines are very dangerous and were it to be made available, it would make it clear the vaccines were very dangerous and create a lot of problems for the officials who pushed the vaccine.  Likewise, it is a longstanding practice in the pharmaceutical industry to not disclose clinical trial data that makes their product look bad but simultaneously to parade anything which makes it looks good.
After
the original shedding article
went viral, one of the most ardent defenders of the scientific orthodoxy (a cancer doctor named David Gorski) was compelled to write
a blog post debunking it
. Gorski’s
post
in turn “debunked” the shedding article by asserting Gorski’s belief that the “mechanistic trap” was a good thing, and that my theory had no validity since there was not a credible mechanism to support it (even though the proposed mechanisms were listed later in the article).  I share this to illustrate how committed people are to the mechanistic trap, as even when you clearly point it out to them, they often still can’t stop themselves from falling into it.
Note: I think it’s good practice to review critiques of your positions from hostile parties, as while not necessarily nice, they are often extremely helpful for quickly cluing you into mistakes or oversights you made that need to be corrected.
Is Shedding Possible?
In the case of shedding, a few major points argue against it being possible.
•The design of the mRNA vaccines was that lipid nanoparticles containing mRNA were injected into the body, after which they made their way into cells and causes cells to begin producing vaccine spike protein for an unspecified amount of time.
•Because of this, there were relatively few options of what could be shed.  For instance, while it is unlikely the lipid nanoparticles or the mRNA it contained could be transmitted from the vaccinated individuals to their environment, if it could be, there was very little to transmit, so it was simply not possible a single injection could contain enough vaccine material to perpetually sicken those around the vaccinated individual.
Note: some people in the movement believe consequential unlisted contaminants may also be present in the vaccines.
•The only remaining option was that the spike protein being produced by the vaccine was the agent that “shed” (e.g., because the mRNA didn’t break down and hence produced spike indefinitely or because the mRNA had integrated into the cell genome and hence the body was producing spike indefinitely).
•Spike “shedding” didn’t make sense either because the concentration of spike protein (which is rapidly broken down in the environment) would have to be orders of magnitude higher within the vaccinated individual than in the area around them.  In turn, this argues against the shedding being able to affect others if an infinitely higher concentration did not affect the vaccinated individual.
Typically, shedding occurs (e.g., from a live viral vaccine like MMR or polio) because an individual “sheds” a self replicating form of the disease.  This results in the low concentration of the pathogen which the shedder expels into their environment then amplifying within the recipient and eventually reaching a comparable concentration to what was found in the “shedder.”
Since I was nonetheless seeing numerous clear cut cases of shedding occurring, this suggested to me that I was missing a huge piece of the puzzle which once known invalidated much of the above logic.
Conversely, I could not help but notice
that Pfizer’s protocol
for testing their vaccine:
Prohibited pregnant women or those breast feeding from receiving the vaccine (or future doses if they had already received one).
Note: due to
the thalidomide disaster
, a foundational rule in medical ethics is that you do not experiment on pregnant women due to the potential danger this exposes the fetus to.
Stated it needed to be reported if a pregnant women (e.g., a healthcare worker in the trials) was exposed to the intervention by inhalation or skin contact from someone who had been vaccinated.
•Stated it needed to be reported if someone in the previous category (not vaccinated but exposed to someone who was) then was in close proximity to their wife and their wife was pregnant.
This suggested either that Pfizer knew shedding was a real problem, or that they were following the existing standards—
the FDA stipulates
that gene therapies need to be evaluated for shedding before being given to humans (and furthermore be subsequently tested for shedding in humans).  For context,
both the FDA
and the
EMA
classify the mRNA vaccines as a gene therapy.
Note: the first approved gene therapy,
Luxturna
, (which works like the J&J vaccine by using a modified virus to produce a target protein in the patient), is an eye medication which treats a rare form of genetic vision loss.  Its prescribing information specifies that Luxturna can be found in a patient’s tears after injection and it hence for the first seven days after injection, care must be taken to avoid anyone else coming in contact with those tears to prevent unintended shedding of the product.  Another similar gene therapy,
Roctavian
also
was found to shed
(e.g., into semen), and the FDA advises those who receive it to not donate semen or impregnate someone for at least 6 months after administration.  Finally, Zolgensma, a gene therapy, utilizing a different virus
was also found to shed for a month
, and its package insert advises that during this time, to be careful of how feces from the patients are disposed of (so no one else is exposed to it).  Additionally,
there is one other gene therapy on the market
, but due to its design, shedding was unlikely (and hence undetected) so the FDA does not advise special precautions for its recipients.
Curiously
,
the package insert for Pfizer’s vaccine
does not mention shedding at all (despite the fact it has long since been proven), and likewise J&J’s vaccine (which is very similar to the currently approved viral gene therapies) does not have shedding mentioned
in its inserts either
.
In short, like the cancer issue, I suspect Pfizer had concerning data on the shedding issue but opted not to disclose it so it could be claimed there was “no evidence” of shedding.
Note: in my eyes, the most unacceptable side effect of a pharmaceutical is if it harms individuals beyond those who received it.  This for instance is why the federal government eventually cracked down on opioid prescriptions, as the opioid epidemic has been devastating for the communities affected by it.  Similarly, this is why I recently focused on
the decades of evidence linking SSRI antidepressants to triggering psychotic violence
(e.g., mass shootings).
What is Known About Shedding?
While I have seen many anecdotal cases suggesting "shedding is real, in my eyes, the strongest proof for shedding comes from the observations by Pierre Kory and Scott Marsland
at their clinical practice
which is dedicated to treating vaccine injuries (which places them in a unique position to observe and evaluate this phenomenon).  They have:
•Seen more than twenty patients develop similar symptoms after a shedding exposure, particularly after a “strong” shedding exposure.
•Found that those symptoms resemble what is seen in other spike protein pathologies (e.g., long COVID or a mRNA vaccine injury).
•Found those symptoms often respond to the same treatments used for treating other spike protein pathologies (e.g., ivermectin which binds the spike protein).
•Found many patients will repeatedly have shedding symptoms emerge after the same exposure (e.g., always feeling ill when a vaccinated husband returns from a long trip away, when going to church each week, when singing with their choir, or when taking a crowded route to work).
•Been able to determine that those they suspect are a shedder (e.g., the husband) test positive (through an antibody test) for a high spike protein levels.
•Found that eliminating the shedder from the patient’s life or treating the (asymptomatic) shedder with a vaccine injury protocol significantly helps their patient get well.
Note: much of the above has also been repeatedly noted within the hundreds of comments I received.
Since mRNA shedding is such a mysterious phenomenon, a good place to start with unlocking this mystery is to see what’s currently known about it and try to discern what underlying principles could account for those observations.
Lastly, I want to note that
a 2023 peer-reviewed study
found that unvaccinated individuals who were around COVID-19 vaccinated individuals developed an immune response to the spike protein (which the authors
hypothesized
was due to antibodies being directly transferred through the breath).  This in turn demonstrates that something is indeed being transferred from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated (e.g., the spike protein).
Note: henceforth, I will not discuss the J&J (or Astrazeneca, Sputnik or Sinovac) COVID vaccines, as these are viruses vector vaccines and hence operate under different principles than the mRNA vaccines. I believe this is appropriate to do here as the majority of those vaccinated received an mRNA vaccine and I want to keep this article as short as possible.
Susceptibility to Exposure
Note: since I will reference a lot of reader reports throughout this series to corroborate the patterns I am referencing, to save space, they will simply be designated with numbers which link to each comment (e.g., [1, 2, 3] ).
Sensitivity to shedding varies immensely.  At this point, I believe the majority of people who are being affected by shedding either already know it and if they don’t, they will by the time they complete this article.  This is important because one of the major fears everyone who is unvaccinated has if they are “at risk” from shedders.
In general, there seem to be three categories of people who are susceptible to shedding.
Note: often they belong to more than one of these categories.
The first are the sensitive patients [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
].  For example, near the start of the vaccine rollout (before I was aware of that shedding was an issue), I saw this video and genuinely wondered if it was real as many of its claims were quite extraordinary but at the same time were somewhat in line with what a sensitive patient would describe.
However, I’ve since seen numerous accounts from sensitive patients identically matching hers.
I wrote
a much longer article about this archetype
, but briefly, these patients tend to:
•Be highly sensitive to toxins in their environment (hence leading to them frequently being injured by pharmaceutical products).
•Be very empathetic and perceptive of subtle qualities others do not notice.
•Have an ectomorph or Sattvic constitution.
•Frequently have ligamentous laxity (e.g., Ehlers-Danlos has been correlated with being predisposed to HPV vaccine injuries and many are now reporting EDS predisposes one to a COVID vaccine injury).
Note: I recently published
an article
explaining why EDS patients (and other hypermobile individuals) why this happens and our approaches to treating these patients. Many readers here (after reading
either that article
or the earlier version of this one on shedding) remarked that the articles perfectly described their situation (e.g., they had EDS, were very sensitive and had had either a vaccine injury or mRNA shedding injury).
Due to these susceptibilities, those patients frequently have chronic illnesses such as mast cell degranulation disorder, multiple chemical sensitivities, EMF sensitivities, Lyme disease, mold toxicity and fibromyalgia.  These patients were more likely to avoid the COVID vaccine (due to their previous bad experiences with pharmaceuticals) and more likely to be chronically debilitated by the COVID vaccine (or a COVID-19 infection).  Tragically, we’ve also seen many people develop these sensitivities after a COVID-19 vaccine injury, and a few people have shared spike shedding caused them to develop environmental sensitivities (e.g.,
this reader
lost the ability to eat meat unless they addressed their shedding—something I had previously only seen after
tick borne diseases
).  Additionally, I
received a report
from someone who noticed environmental EMFs worsened their sensitivities to shedding.
Note: I believe that many of these sensitivities result from the
Cell Danger Response
(CDR) being activated and then failing to turn off (while conversely,
treating the CDR
is often very beneficial to these patients).
The sensitive patients tend to be the most susceptible to shedding, and I’ve seen numerous reports of individuals (e.g.,
consider this report from one of Pierre Kory’s patients
) who can immediately tell if they are around individuals who have been vaccinated (e.g., because they immediately feel a “toxic” presence or
feel a shedder injure them
).  Likewise, these patients tend to become ill from “weaker” shedding exposures.
Note: I consider myself to be a sensitive individual but I have not had any issue being in close proximity to people (e.g., patients) who were recently vaccinated.  Conversely, many of my sensitive female friends (who are less sensitive than me) have experienced notable effects from shedding (e.g., menstrual abnormalities), which suggests to me there is more to this picture than just having a “sensitive” constitution.
The second are patients who have been sensitized to the spike protein due to a previous vaccine injury or having long COVID.  These patients in turn frequently find their symptoms worsen when they are around individuals who were vaccinated and many have reported that their sensitivity to shedding increases with time.
Note: I believe the Cell Danger Response (discussed
here
) provides one of the best models to explain what happens to the patients in the first two categories (as
treating the CDR
often greatly helps these patients).  Likewise, I also find a pre-existing impairment in zeta potential (
discussed in the previous article
) frequently predisposes patients to these issues, while
restoring the physiologic zeta potential
often greatly benefits them.  Finally, since the spike protein is an allergen
that is highly effective at creating autoimmunity in the body
, that also can explain why successive exposures to it increase one’s sensitivity to it (likewise some of the most effective COVID-19 treatments simply used medications normally used to treat allergies).
The third are the people who cannot effectively produce antibodies to the spike protein.  I was initially clued into this after
I saw a study of vaccinated patients
who developed myocarditis which discovered that (unlike controls) their ability to develop a neutralizing antibody for the spike protein was impaired, leading to a large amount of free spike protein circulating in their blood (whereas normally it would be bound to an antibody).  Because of this, the spike protein being produced in their body is thus able to create havoc throughout it and those patients become symptomatic after being exposed to a much lower concentration of the spike protein.  It is important to note that while reactive to shedding, these patients are nowhere near as sensitive to shedding as the previously described “sensitive patients.”
Note: at the time of
the disastrous smallpox campaign
, many clinicians believed that those with a weakened immune system could not mount a response to the vaccine, and in turn were both more likely to be injured by it and to catch smallpox (both before and after vaccination).  This led them to argue the vaccine’s “efficacy” was an artifact of it being a proxy for a functioning immune system, and I believe
the myocarditis study
suggests something similar is occurring for the spike protein vaccines.
Additionally, while very rare, I have received a few compelling cases which suggest pets (cats or dogs) can also be susceptible to shedding events [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
].  If shedding did indeed happen there, it suggests (as a few readers have shared) that certain human beings are much greater shedders than others, and that the shedding agent has a mechanism of harm which is not dependent upon a human receptor (e.g., it adversely affects
the physiologic zeta potential
).
Characteristics of Shedders
There are two forms of shedding: primary (where someone gets ill from being around a vaccinated person—e.g.,
vaccinated parents making their unvaccinated children ill
) and secondary (where someone gets ill from being around an unvaccinated person who was recently around vaccinated people).  Primary shedding is much more common, but secondary is also sometimes reported (particularly for sensitive patients).  Secondary shedding can happen with both individuals who became ill from a shedder (more common) or from someone who was not affected by a shedder (e.g., children shedding and affecting parents after coming back home from school).  Secondary shedding is one of the most confusing aspects of this phenomenon as I don’t feel many of the mechanisms I’ve proposed to explain why shedding is happening can account for secondary shedding.
Note: Pfizer’s trial protocol (mentioned above) also addressed the possibility of both primary and secondary shedding.
The most common observation with shedders is that they are dramatically more likely to shed soon after vaccination (depending on who you ask, this window ranges from three days to four weeks).  However, more, sensitive patients find they are affected by a shedder indefinitely and strongly disagree with a 2-4 week cutoff.
I believe this essentially matches
what has been found in numerous studies
—that following vaccination, spike protein production in the blood spikes and then declines but never reaches zero and appears to continue for months afterwards (presently we don’t know how long the effect lasts for as it simply hasn’t been monitored long enough).
Additionally, quite a few people have noticed that shedding events (in the same location) are the most frequent and severe immediately following a new booster rollout, after which they gradually diminish until the next booster campaign.
It has also been observed that young and healthy people tend to shed more frequently (presumably since their body has a greater capacity to manufacture the spike), children shed the most, and that the elderly shed the least frequently.  Additionally, quite a few people have observed that shedding greatly varies by the individual (e.g., “
I react to specific people I see at church
”).
Repeatedly boosting appears to worsen shedding for three reasons:
•It causes patients to resume having high spike protein levels in their body as typically after vaccination or boosting, there is a spike and then decline of spike protein which persists at a low level for months (again, no study has yet assessed if it lasts for years).
•Successive boosting appears to increase the degree of shedding which occurs when compared to the previous injections the patient experienced.
•Quite a few holistic healers have shared that they believe the most recent boosters are more potent and hence cause greater shedding than the earlier ones (which might be explained by the boosters now containing multiple strains of mRNA to cover the new variants).
The Shedding Odor
One of the odd things quite a few people have reported is a distinct smell which emerged around them after the vaccines entered the market.  For example,
consider this comment
from a reader:
In terms of crowds... I too have experienced this many times. I feel unwell with flu like symptoms and can smell a unique ordour around people. After feeling this way and smelling the same ordour several times in company with family and friends, I confirmed the correlation with the covid vaccination. As it transpired each has been vaccinated within the previous week. I am very sensitive to meds and in general and I swear I can smell something so now I ask and yep the link is there!
I have received a variety of similar descriptions of the smell itself  [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
,
28
,
29
,
30
,
31
,
32
], along with many more from readers who “tasted” or “felt” it.  Since I can’t smell this odor, I don’t yet feel confident trying to provide a description of what the smell is.  In the second half of this series, where I explore the mysteries of the shedding phenomenon, I will provide a much more detailed description of that smell and what we think it may represent.
Note: one of the things I find interesting about the smell is that the two most common shedding tastes reported were “sweet” or “metallic” and
in the recently released V-safe free-text data
, many disclosed that they noticed a similar taste following COVID vaccination (e.g., in the first batch of reports, 2346 respondents reported experiencing a metallic taste, whereas for comparison 15,786 vaccine recipients reported dizziness or vertigo).
Routes of Exposure
There appear to be three possible routes of exposure.
General proximity to the vaccinated person—this is most likely respiratory in nature and the most common form of shedding exposure reported by patients (e.g.,
this reader
believes the shedding traveled through an air vent).  However, I have seen a few reports which suggest places which are separated by barriers (e.g.,
being inside a car near a crowded intersection
) can also produce that exposure.  Additionally, many have said they find shedding to be greatly mitigated when outdoors.
Note: numerous people have reported long term symptoms occurring after they received a treatment session (e.g., massage, acupuncture, or chiropractic) from a vaccinated individual (especially one who had been recently vaccinated).  For this reason, I am curious to see when those businesses will stop declaring their vaccination status (similarly, some of my patients became my patients because they wanted an unvaccinated doctor who would not make them ill).
Through skin to skin contact.  Often patients report that they have some difficulty around vaccinated individuals, but notice things become much worse once some physical contact occurs, especially prolonged physical contact.  This is thought to be due to the spike protein being “shed” in the sweat.
Note: many people have shared that a recently vaccinated healthcare provider (e.g., a massage therapist or chiropractor) shed on them during their “treatment,” after which the individual developed permanent complications. Likewise, numerous unvaccinated healthcare providers (e.g., an acupuncturist) have shared that they have now have great difficulty seeing vaccinated (particularly recently boosted) patients and have had to adjust their practice to accommodate for this.  I in turn wonder how long it will be until the market forces those practices (particularly the holistic ones) to stop advertising (e.g., with a window sign) that all of their staff were vaccinated.  Similarly, I have a few patients who specifically sought me out because I was unvaccinated and they could no longer handle their vaccinated healthcare providers.
Additionally, I have seen a few reports where the shedding effect appeared to be transferable (e.g., someone touched an object a vaccinated person touched like a phone and then became ill).  Sadly, I have also come across multiple reports [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
] of cleaner noticing a distinct difference in areas shedders had been in (e.g., they get ill in those environments—possibly from touching surfaces that were shed on, they can smell the shedding smell, or they notice sheets the vaccinated individuals slept in have a slightly yellowish tint).  Additionally,
one reader
shared that they can no longer tolerate going to public restrooms due to shedding, while
another shared
they got ill from sleeping in sheets a vaccinated individual slept in.
Note: Individuals I trust have stated spike is excreted in the sweat.  However when I tried to find that information,
I could only locate research
which suggested it was (as secretions occurred in analogous situations), but I could never find a study which directly measured the presence of vaccine spike protein in sweat.
There is also some evidence shedding occurs in other secretions.  This has been most clearly shown with vaccine mRNA being packaged into exosomes found in breast milk (e.g.,
see this study in the Lancet
) but there is some evidence suggesting it applies to other secretions (e.g., sweat or saliva) as well.
Additionally, there have been concerning infant reactions to breast milk from vaccinated mothers
within VAERS
and far more in
Pfizer’s adverse event collection system
(further discussed within
this excellent article
), which suggest some form of toxicity is being transmitted via the breast milk.  Additionally, a
study
published a year ago in JAMA found that 3.5% of women reported a decrease in breast milk supply and 1-2% reported “issues with their breastmilk-fed infant after vaccination.”
Note:
an excellent research paper
(which, given its content, will likely never get published) discovered in multiple countries that when adults received the COVID vaccine but no one under 18 was being vaccinated, death rates significantly increased in children.  While this is understandably difficult to believe (due to its troubling implications), the same pattern
was also detected by another researcher in the Phillipines
.
Additionally, I have seen multiple reports where the region of the patient which experienced the shedding reaction (e.g., a bruise, a rash, or a cancer) was the part of the patient which was physically closest to the shedder.
Timing of Exposure
There seem to be three common variants of exposures:
•Immediate—Patients often notice this, and either feel as though some type of poison
had been immediately injected into them
, or that there is an oppressive presence in the area they are entering which makes them feel unwell.
Note: I presently suspect this form occurs in the most sensitive patients as the symptoms experienced in concurrence with that “oppressive presence” are often quite similar to what mold-sensitive patients experience in moldy rooms and EMF-sensitive patients experience in high EMF areas.
•A 6-24 hour delay—This seems to be the most common variant.  In certain cases, patients have reported this occurring like clockwork (e.g., every Monday they or a relative gets ill after they had gone to church on Sunday).
•A longterm delay—This is often seen in the patients who have the most severe complications from vaccine shedding.
In each of these cases, patients will typically recover after a few days, but there were also many patients who reported a permanent (partial or debilitating) illness after the shedding exposure.
Symptoms of Exposure
Many of the symptoms of shedding appear to match what is seen in both long COVID and vaccine injuries, again suggesting this is a spike protein mediated disease (especially since the effects of a shedding exposure are often reduced once a spike protein treatment like ivermectin and to a lesser extent nattokinase are started for a patient).  However, while the symptoms overlap, some are more common after vaccination while a few are more common after a shedding exposure.
All of this I believe is a testament to the fact that (as discussed
in the previous article
) the effects of the mRNA gene therapies are not all predictable or consistent and
it was hence extremely premature to administer these highly variable injections to the general population
.
Most Common Symptoms
By far the most commonly reported symptoms are gynecologic in nature. Of these, menstrual abnormalities are by far the most common (something also seen with the vaccine), and I have lost count of how many people have shared a story of a short or long-term menstrual abnormality which occurred immediately after what they in hindsight realized was a textbook shedding exposure.  Since this is so frequently reported, I will not link to each example of it (as you will immediately find many once
you read the comments
).
Note: I suspect there is a hormonal component to this as a few women have reported measured hormonal levels changing after shedding exposures [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
], but I have not been able to get enough data to have a clear position on what’s happening. The best case report I know of comes from
this reader
, who regularly measured her hormones and repeatedly found her estrogen spiked after a shedding exposure.  Conversely, another (50 year old) woman (who is also a physician)
shared that
after her shedding exposure, her estrogen and progesterone dropped to 0 (while some testosterone remained).
In some cases, highly unusual menstrual abnormalities occur (e.g., profuse bleeding which sometimes is voluminous enough
to create severe anemia
, or
massive clots
they’ve never seen before being passed).  Additionally, I’ve now met a few women who were in menopause (and in two cases a woman without a uterus) began having menstrual bleeding after a vaccine exposure.  Likewise, many post-menopausal women have reported that shedding caused them to either bleed or develop severe menstrual cramps [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
].
Note: I have also come across a few cases of women becoming menopausal due to shedding [e.g.,
1
,
2
].
In early 2021 I belonged to a large Facebook group where we actively discussed menstrual abnormalities created by the vaccine and from shedding exposures (a lot of women there observed this).  Unfortunately, rather than raising a red flag to any organizations that advocate for women, the group was banned in a coordinated attempt to sweep this side effect under the rug.
I, in turn, was astounded by how many people within that group reported experiencing a decidual cast shedding (the entire lining of the uterus coming off as one piece), and since that time I’ve met one woman in real life this happened to (along with learning of
a case reported to Dr. Kory
and having
one shared by a reader
).  For context, this is a very rare condition (e.g.,
one paper
which looked into this found prior to the vaccines, less than 40 cases of it had been reported in medical journals across the world—making the condition rare enough that it is impossible to estimate how frequent it is).  Yet,
in a survey
which 6049 (vaccinated and unvaccinated) women responded to, 292 (4.83% of respondents) reported a decidual cast shedding event, of whom 277 had never been vaccinated (and of those 277, most reported having been around vaccinated individuals).
Note: while I am not allowed to share all the data from that survey (as it has not been published), I can disclose that it also evaluated a variety of other commonly reported shedding effects (e.g., heavy menstrual bleeding, post-menopausal bleeding, abnormal bruising or nose bleeds) and found that many unvaccinated individuals are experiencing those symptoms and in almost all cases, they were more common in individuals who were around vaccinated individuals.
Most tragically, I have heard of quite a few cases where a shedding exposure appeared to end a pregnancy [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
, but it is still rare enough I have no idea if it’s something to be concerned about.
Note: while I am undecided on the miscarriage risk of shedding, I am relatively sure COVID vaccination can cause a miscarriage as I have seen numerous cases where this seemed to have happened.  For example, in a small group I’m connected to, two of the employees had relatives who got pregnant.  They both also got vaccinated during their pregnancy and then lost their baby (e.g., one was vaccinated at 13 weeks after her OBGYN said COVID vaccination was essential and then miscarried at 16 weeks).  Likewise, a few of my colleagues are now having certain vaccinated patients who are greatly struggling to conceive (and greatly contrast what my colleagues had seen prior to the vaccines).
In parallel to menstrual abnormalities being the most common shedding symptom, we have all found women are more likely to experience adverse events from shedding than me (which is particularly unfortunate as medicine has a longstanding practice of
gaslighting women
who present with symptoms the doctor can’t make sense of).
Note:
A recent study of 140,000 women
found 42% of them reported menstrual abnormalities after vaccination. Through my network, I know that a formal study was conducted with a decent sample size
which was able to demonstrate the majority of unvaccinated women studied developed menstrual abnormalities when exposed to vaccinated individuals
.  However, since that article is still working its way through the peer review process, I cannot disclose anything else in it (as I do not want to derail its publication).
Presently I am not sure if women in general are more sensitive to shedding than men, or if menstruation specifically (which only applies to women) is more sensitive to shedding than anything else, and if the other systems (e.g., the heart) are harmed at an equal rate for both genders.
Note: in men, I find the closest equivalent to menstrual issues is “groin pain” which while repeatedly reported, does not occur anywhere near as frequently as menstrual issues.
Common Symptoms
I typically associate menstrual abnormalities (e.g., those described previously) with a Chinese medicine condition known as “
blood stasis
” which in many ways is analogous to “
impaired zeta potential
.” In turn, I’ve found that many of the other symptoms commonly associated with shedding (e.g., headaches) are also viewed as a consequence of blood stasis. For example,
this reader
describes a classic blood stasis headache (and a variety of other symptoms associated with blood stasis):
Shortly after [my husband] received the vaccine, I started getting severe headaches, like nothing I had ever experienced before. It felt like a nail had been driven through my temple or eye, and my blood pressure would also spike at the same time. I have orthostatic hypotension and chronically low Bp, so this was notably unusual for me.
Note: hence forward, I will designate symptoms associated with blood stasis (e.g., those that can be due to impaired blood flow to the brain) with a *.
Outside of menstrual abnormalities, the most commonly reported symptoms are as follows:
•Headaches*, which are often described as migraines* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
,
28
,
29
,
30
,
31
,
32
,
33
,
34
,
35
,
36
,
37
,
38
,
39
,
40
,
41
,
42
,
43
,
44
,
45
,
46
,
47
,
48
,
49
,
50
,
51
,
52
,
53
,
54
,
55
,
56
,
57
,
58
].
•Tinnitus [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
], which along with nosebleeds appears to be the most noticeable symptoms of shedding.
Note: tinnitus is a condition conventional medicine struggles with (which is unfortunate due to it being a common COVID vaccine injury), and I have not seen good results with the therapies currently being explored for that (e.g.,
TMS
).  Presently I predominantly view tinnitus as being a result of impaired blood flow to the brain or inappropriate over-activation of the nervous system (although I occasionally see other causes like individuals being acoustically sensitive to EMFs).   This is because I’ve found using
neural therapy
to down-regulate the sympathetic nervous system (which I believe certain individuals
like this person
are “hearing”), or methods to restore blood flow to parts of the brain (e.g.,
precise applications of prolotherapy
in the cervical spine or
improving a patient’s zeta potential
) frequently helps tinnitus.  Additionally, I find Chinese medicine is often quite helpful for tinnitus as the condition is well fitted to their diagnostic framework.
Nosebleeds [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
].  These are often profuse, frequent throughout the day and immediately follow exposure to a vaccinated individual.
Note: these reports suggest that whatever is shedding damages the lining of blood vessels.
Painless and inexplicable bruising* [
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
] is also commonly observed after a shedding exposure, although two distinctly different types are observed.  Sometimes many tiny bruises spontaneously emerge, which is often indicative of an immune process destroying the platelets (e.g.,
see this reader’s account
), but more frequently large painless bruises are observed.  Additionally,
one reader reported
that her limbs, abdomen and veins will consistently turn blue (which I associate with blood stasis) 4-6 hours after working with triple-vaccinated patients.
Note: bruising is one of the only symptoms I know of that is more commonly seen after shedding than vaccination (the other is nosebleeds—vision issues may be the third but I am less sure of that one).  The classic way vaccines cause bruising is with
ITP
(what caused the previously cited reader’s tiny bruises), and while
ITP
is
officially acknowledged as a side effect of many vaccines
, it is nonetheless fairly rare (e.g., 1 in 100,000 COVID vaccine recipients).  Presently, I have a few theories to explain why these bruises are happening but I am not confident in any of them.
Dizziness* is also frequently reported [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
], and in many cases occurs immediately after physical intimacy with a vaccinated partner.
In addition to the symptoms representative of blood stasis, there are three commonly reported ones that are more immunological in nature.
The first is mental cloudiness and a general feeling of being unwell (e.g., how you feel before a flu).  This can include feeling as though a fog has come over them, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, joint pain or quickly coming down with symptoms similar to those experienced when the individual had COVID.  Additionally, I now have multiple cases where someone (e.g., a friend) appeared to have caught COVID from someone who was recently vaccinated that they had frequently been around but never caught COVID from before (one of which provides a very compelling argument for this correlation).
Note: some of the above symptoms can also be associated with blood stasis, but the link is less clearcut.  Additionally, since this was so frequently reported, it was difficult for me to cite all the cases that were reported here.
The second is that in the same way that the COVID vaccines cause immune suppression and reactivate latent infections such as Lyme or EBV, lighter versions of latent reactivations have also been seen after shedding events (e.g.,
this is a compelling case history
of it happening with herpes).  Additionally, this immune suppression may also explain why individuals develop COVID or a COVID-like illness after being exposed to a shedding event.
Note: a few readers reported shedding appearing to reactivate Lyme [e.g.,
1
,
2
] and EBV [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
], although some of these cases may instead have been
a reactivation of the CDR
.
By far, the most common reactivation associated with the COVID vaccines is shingles, and likewise, the most commonly reported reactivation after a shedding exposure is shingles [
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
].
Note: in some of these cases the link between shedding to shingles is very clear, while in others it is less so. Additionally, I believe some of these cases may be a result of immune suppressed vaccinated individuals directly spreading the shingles virus rather than “shedding” activating a latent shingles infection.
The third are skin rashes* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
,
28
,
29
,
30
], something we also repeatedly saw in the vaccinated (e.g., at dermatology clinics—where sadly the dermatologists insisted again and again the rashes could not be linked to the vaccine).  Most frequently these resemble hives, although a few people also reported psoriasis [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
], shingles-like rashes and areas that felt like a rash but not was visible [e.g.,
1
,
2
].  Here are two examples of the rashes [
1
,
2
]:
Note: there are a lot of nuances to correctly diagnosing skin conditions, which is why I am hesitant to be more specific (I have only seen the vaccinated skin rashes, and while the shedding ones sound similar, I am not sure if they are as I have not seen them with my own eyes).
Less Frequent Symptoms
Some of the less frequent symptoms I see repeatedly reported (which are also frequently seen with the vaccines) include:
•Atrial Fibrillation* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
].  Many have also reported heart palpitations or PVCs [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
], which often indicates undiagnosed atrial fibrillation.
Note: Atrial fibrillation, being a classic blood stasis condition which often responds well
to restoring the physiologic zeta potential
(e.g.,
see this reader’s comment
).
•Muscle pain* [e.g., [
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
]. This seemed to be a mix of the typical aches felt at the onset of flu-like symptoms, severe or chronic cramps and tightening or pain in areas (e.g., the calves) where muscle pain was frequently reported after mRNA vaccination (e.g., this was one of the most common side effects reported by Pfizer in
their original clinical trial
).  One
reader’s shedding report
particularly stood out for suggesting that a pathologic process was ocurring within the muscle.
Note: numerous readers also reported experiencing other types of musculoskeletal pain after shedding.
•Seizures* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
].
•Peripheral Neuropathy* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
].  Additionally, readers also reported other signs (e.g., numbness or pins and needles) of impaired blood flow to the peripheral nerves [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
].
•Insomnia* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
].
•
Hairloss
* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
].
•Swollen lymph nodes [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
].  In many cases, individuals report this swelling immediately after a shedding exposure.
•Severe abdominal pain* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
].  These cases have made me wonder if the partner is experiencing something similar to
mesenteric ischemia
as a result of the microclotting in the bowels or an allergic reaction to the shedding agent (e.g., semen).
•Sinus pressure or a copious nasal discharge [
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
].
Note: this shedding symptom and even more so with the nose bleeds which immediately follow exposure to a shedder suggests that whatever is shedding travels through the air.
•Eye issues* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
] such as microclots to the eyes. We saw more severe forms of this with the COVID vaccines (e.g., two retinal infarctions,
which traditionally affect around 0.001% of people each year
), while the less severe ones appear to be more common after shedding exposures.
Rarer Symptoms
In most cases, I find the severe vaccine side effects (e.g., a heart attack) are dramatically less likely to occur following a shedding exposure than following vaccination (which to some extent makes sense from a toxicity standpoint as they are receiving a much lower dose of the spike).
Nonetheless, I have seen quite a few examples shared by readers such as:
•
Multiple signs of a stroke
* (e.g., drooping facial muscles and difficulty concentrating or driving).
•Severe blood clots* [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
.
5
,
6
], some of which were life threatening and resembled those seen after the vaccine.  Additionally,
one reader reported
observing them in cats that were around a shedder.
•Severe heart injuries in children [e.g.,
1
,
2
].
•
Polymyalgia Rheumatica
[e.g.,
1
,
2
].
Note: PMR is a debilitating autoimmune disease repeatedly seen after COVID vaccination.
•
An individual
with progressively worsening seizures (due to shedding) eventually experiencing a fatal seizure after a Thanksgiving dinner with vaccinated family members.
•
A cancer
which appeared to be strongly linked to the vaccine shedding.
Note: linking a cancer to shedding is almost impossible to prove, but I believe
this case
represents the closest you can get (especially since the recipient received an unusually high shedding dose from her husband). Additionally, her rare cancer was identical to the aggressive one that a
Moderna vaccine trial recipient developed
(and Moderna never disclosed in their trial report despite the trial participant doing everything she could to get it recognized).
•
A shaking, buzzing, or feeling as though fireworks were going off inside the body [e.g.,
1
,
2
,
3
].  Above, while discussing tinnitus, I argued that I associate these symptoms with an over-activation of the sympathetic nervous system, an assessment I in part came to after experiencing something very similar when I caught COVID which persisted until the sympathetic activation was addressed (at which point what I experienced immediately subsided).
•
One reader
reported psychiatric complications from shedding (e.g., anxiety and more easily being stressed by situations).  I suspect this issue is also quite common, but not something which occurred to most responders to include.
Overall Impressions Of This Data
One of David Gorski’s (predictable) critiques of
the original article
was that it relied upon anecdotes rather than “evidence.”  While this could be argued, once this many compelling “anecdotes” exist, I would argue enough data has been compiled for it to constitute evidence of a very real phenomenon, especially given that:
•These “anecdotes” occurred
in a repeatable and predictable manner
.
Note: there also seemed to be an even split between individuals who had a cluster of the common spike protein injury symptoms and individuals who only had a single symptom.
•
Readers here
only realized they were being affected by shedding once they saw that what they had experienced matched what many others reported.  This suggests they did not have a preconceived notion which caused them to hypnotize themselves into believing they were being harmed by shedding.
•Many of these symptoms were observed in the
MyCycleStory
survey of 6049 individuals.
•A paper working its way through peer review found exposing unvaccinated women to shedders induced menstrual abnormalities in the majority of those women.
Since this is understandably a taboo area to explore (e.g., I have no idea if the above paper will ever be accepted for publication), it has hence become necessary to bypass the scientific apparatus with articles like this one (or
Pierre Kory’s series
) and the MyCycleStory survey.
However, while this data looks alarming, I need to emphasize that it’s still fairly rare for me to encounter individuals who are being severely affected by shedding and the cases in here drew from a very large pool of people (I would guess somewhere between
500,000 to one million
people
heard of the original article
which requested stories to be shared).
Presently, I consider the COVID vaccines to cause the most severe spike protein injuries and to affect the greatest number of people.  Conversely while problematic, I believe the complications of long COVID are less severe than COVID vaccine injuries, easier to treat and affect far less people (especially when you consider that many cases of vaccine injuries are being falsely attributed to “long COVID”).  In turn, I believe shedding injuries are less severe than the complications of long COVID, and likewise that they are a rarer issue as they predominantly affect the most sensitive members of the population.
Nonetheless, while I do not believe you should be greatly concerned about shedding if it has not yet affected you, I do believe those being harmed by it need to be aware of it and should be treated with compassion and respect rather than being dismissed and ridiculed.
Note: Patients with spike protein injuries frequently observe that their symptoms ebb and flow. Both I, Dr. Kory and
a few of the readers here
now believe that some of that is due to their shedding exposures.
Presently, I believe one of the best strategies the movement has going forward is to actively petition for a federal law to be passed which says that for a gene therapy product to enter the market it must:
•Have had studies conducted which properly evaluated all potential routes of shedding for product.
•Have those studies be made available to the public since the general public rather than just the individual who consented to receiving the therapy can be affected by the product.
•Have it be feasible for those who receive the product to prevent that shedding from occurring (e.g., Roctavian, mentioned earlier, sheds in the semen for six months, and as a result its recipients are instructed not to donate semen or impregnate someone for six months).
•Have the product be pulled from the market if either outside investigators discover the manufacturer’s data was wrong and the product does indeed shed or its discovered the typical recipient is not following the measures necessary to mitigate the gene therapy’s shedding.
Conclusion:
Once the COVID vaccines hit the market, I immediately noticed many of my patients reported significant reactions to them I’d never seen with any other vaccine and I began to have numerous friends contacting me to share that their relative had had a tragic heart attack or stroke following vaccination.
While I had suspected there would be many issues with the vaccines (e.g., I’d expected something similar to the
1976 Swine Flu disaster
), my expectation was for most of the issues to be chronic in nature (e.g.,
infertility
,
cancer
and
autoimmunity
—all of what I’ve since written about).
Watching this unfold was quite shocking, especially since I could not convince my colleagues to consider that the vaccine might not be safe—even when they had a patient cancel because “they’d had a fatal heart attack from the vaccine” or a few doctors they worked with suffered severe vaccine injuries.
At the time, I felt quite powerless and decided the one thing I could do would be to document all the injuries which had occurred in my own circle so that at some point they might make it possible to provide evidence which could sway a skeptical party (as I knew no one would publish anything critical of the vaccines in the medical journals). This was incredibly time consuming to do, but I still did it because for some reason I felt strongly compelled to.
Much later (exactly two years ago), Steve Kirsch graciously agreed to promote
an article
I felt was important for the current moment.  Unexpectedly, Kirsch felt compelled
to encourage his readers
to sign up for my Substack.  Not sure what to do with my newfound (small) following,
I published that log
, which went viral, building a large reader base for me and cementing my newfound direction in life as a Substack publisher.
Looking back on it, what I found remarkable about those events was that at the time, no one else had done what I’d done—anonymously publish a large compilation of vaccine injuries they had born witness to, which I believe speaks to the fact many times things you’d expect other people to do will only actually happen if you do them.
At that time I had come across a few compelling cases of (menstrual related) vaccine shedding injuries within my own circle which were very difficult to ascribe to anything besides shedding being a real thing.  However, I felt it was best to not include those cases when I published the log as I felt I was already so far out of the accepted dialog that were I to also include the radical idea that “mRNA vaccines could shed,” it would make many who might have been open to co

[Content truncated…]