Chapter XI: The Six Keys of Eudoxus: The Labyrinth

The First Key: The Trap of Literal Reading
 Although presented last in this sequence, The Six Keys of Eudoxus proved to be exactly what its title suggests: not just a key, but the key through which the rest of the Hermetic canon began to resolve for us.
 If the Emerald Tablet gave the symbolic picture of the cycle, and Sternbuchta gave the portrait of the essence brought forth within it, The Six Keys turns to the work itself: the guarded sequence of openings, dissolutions, separations, washings, coagulations, and fixations by which that essence is brought forth from stone.
 A brief note on the history of The Six Keys of Eudoxus is warranted. The text appears to come out of the late seventeenth century, and scholars have long noted its resemblance to writings attributed to Eirenaeus Philalethes, the alchemical pseudonym widely associated with George Starkey. Starkey was an American born in Bermuda, educated at Harvard, and later active in London in the 1650s, during the same period as Robert Boyle, of Boyle’s law, one of the founders of modern chemistry and a central figure in arguing that scientific inquiry and theology were not in conflict but deeply aligned.
 While no definitive attribution can be made, the text most likely emerged from the same Western European alchemical world, carrying the same preoccupation with guarded method, symbolic compression, and deliberate misdirection that defines that period of the Hermetic tradition.
 What cost me months to see was that the six Keys are not six procedural steps. They are six symbolic vantage points onto one underlying process, repeating it in shifting language so the reader cannot lock onto it too early. Once that became clear, the text no longer read like a sequence of separate instructions.
 For that reason, I will not walk through all six Keys in equal detail. I will begin by moving slowly through the First Key, with our role-grammar already in place and with Shimanishi’s process fully in view. The remaining Keys recast that same work in different symbolic forms.
 For that reason, I will not walk through all six Keys in equal detail. I will begin by moving slowly through the First Key, with our role-grammar already in place and with Shimanishi’s process fully in view. The remaining Keys follow the same basic structure, repeating the same work under different symbolic forms.
 For brevity, I include only the First Key below; for the complete text, readers can consult the text here .
 THE FIRST KEY
 The First Key is that which opens the dark prisons in which the Sulphur is shut up: this is it which knows how to extract the seed out of the body, and which forms the Stone of the philosophers by the conjunction of the spirit with the body—of sulphur with mercury.

 Hermes has manifestly demonstrated the operation of this First Key by these words: In the caverns of the metals there is hidden the Stone, which is venerable, bright in colour, a mind sublime, and an open sea.

 This Stone has a bright glittering: it contains a Spirit of a sublime original; it is the Sea of the Wise, in which they angle for their mysterious Fish.

 But the operations of the three works have a great deal of analogy one to another, and the philosophers do designedly speak in equivocal terms, to the end that those who have not the Lynx’s eyes may pursue wrong, and be lost in this labyrinth, from whence it is very hard to get out. In effect, when one imagines that they speak of one work, they often treat of another.

 Take heed, therefore, not to be deceived here; for it is a truth that in each work the Wise Artist ought to dissolve the body with the spirit; he must cut off the Raven’s head, whiten the Black, and vivify the White; yet it is properly in the First operation that the Wise Artist cuts off the head of the Black Dragon and of the Raven.

 Hence, Hermes says, What is born of the Crow is the beginning of this Art. Consider that it is by separation of the black, foul, and stinking fume of the Blackest Black that our astral, white, and resplendent Stone is formed, which contains in its veins the blood of the Pelican. It is at this First Purification of the Stone, and at this shining whiteness, that the work of the First Key is ended.

 The Key to The Six Keys
 Recall that in Chapters III and IV, I presented the core scientific insights into ISAW chemistry and the Rock–Water Circuit Theory that we used to construct an interpretive key for decoding these texts.
 For decoding The Six Keys , a crucial aspect of the relationship between the two mineral forms central to the Rock–Water Circuit Theory must be noted: only Nature can transform biotite into vermiculite over geologic time; no human can. It is only once it has been weathered into vermiculite that black mica can release the broad range of minerals it contains. If an alchemist—referred to in the text below as a philosopher—began the Work with black mica itself, he would never succeed.
 That point matters because, across centuries of Hermetic alchemy, no universally recognized instance of the substance described in The Six Keys or Letter from Sternbuchta has ever been established. It is my belief that this failure was not accidental, but the result of deliberate misdirection in The Six Keys .
 This text cost me months because it appears simple, but it defeats anyone who reads it as if it were. To wit, the First Key begins with a brazen deception in the first line:
 “The First Key is that which opens the dark prisons in which the Sulphur is shut up.”
 Here, the text suggests that the alchemist should aim to open black mica, “the dark prisons,” in order to access the reactive, redox-capable mineral chemistry locked inside, “the Sulphur.” But that first opening is humanly impossible. It belongs to Nature alone.
 “This Stone has a bright glittering.”
 Again, the text points the reader toward black mica, a stone known for its dark, lustrous shimmer. Then, almost immediately, the author warns the reader of the language he will be encountering:
 “But the operations of the three works have a great deal of analogy one to another, and the philosophers do designedly speak in equivocal terms.”
 Although this line announces that there are three steps in the process, “the operations of the three works,” the steps will be difficult to interpret because the descriptions overlap. In my reading, this is an explicit admission that the same process will be described in shifting language, and that the ambiguity is intentional.
 The warning then sharpens:
 “To the end that those who have not the Lynx’s eyes may pursue wrong, and be lost in this labyrinth, from whence it is very hard to get out. In effect, when one imagines that they speak of one work, they often treat of another.”
 “Lynx’s eyes” refers to the ability to discern what is true from what is false. Without that capacity, the reader cannot tell which step is being described, what material is being acted upon, or when the text has shifted from one operation to another. That is how an alchemist reader can quickly become lost in a labyrinth.
 The text again returns to deceptively suggesting the alchemist begin his work with black mica, yet warning him not to be deceived:
 “Take heed, therefore, not to be deceived here; for it is a truth that in each work the Wise Artist ought to dissolve the body with the spirit; he must cut off the Raven’s head, whiten the Black, and vivify the White; yet it is properly in the First operation that the Wise Artist cuts off the head of the Black Dragon and of the Raven.”
 Read this way, the passage appears, for the first time, to encode—however cryptically—the three distinct and sequential steps in the process:
 (1) The weathering of biotite (black mica) into vermiculite—cut off the head of the Black Dragon.
(2) The separation of the stone from its mineral essence using sulfuric acid—whiten the black.
(3) The emergence of that essence in active aqueous form—vivify the white.
 Just as it warned it would, the text repeats the false instruction that the artist himself must begin by opening biotite (while confusingly naming it twice):
 “It is properly in the First operation that the Wise Artist cuts off the head of the Black Dragon and of the Raven.”
 Any alchemist who began the work with black mica, trying by Art to perform what only Nature can do, would fail every time. Shimanishi did not. He began with vermiculite, starting only after Nature had completed the first step in the process.
 Although the First Key contains a good deal of deliberate misdirection, the later Keys start to offer clearer and more faithful direction. From the Third Key:
 “Hence, Hermes says, What is born of the Crow is the beginning of this Art.”
 This is a clear instruction that the Artist must begin not with black mica itself, but with what is “born of the Crow”: vermiculite weathered from black mica.
 In one instance, the connection to Shimanishi’s method is unusually precise. When the text speaks of a “Secret Fire” that dissolves the Stone “without violence,” it mirrors his discovery that vermiculite must first be air-dried; if sulfuric acid is applied while moisture remains, the material shatters.
 Later in the Third Key, the clearest illustration of the first step appears:
 “But, further, that you may not be deceived with the terms of the Compound, I will tell you that the philosophers have two sorts of compounds. The first is the compound of Nature, whereof I have spoken in the First Key; for it is Nature which makes it in a manner, incomprehensible to the Artist, who does nothing but lend a hand to Nature by the adhibition of external things, by the means of which she brings forth and produces this admirable compound. The second is the compound of Art; it is the Wise man who makes it by the secret union of the fixed with the volatile, perfectly conjoined with all prudence, which cannot be acquired but by the lights of a profound philosophy.”
 Here, the text more clearly points to the rock the Artist must start with. “The first is the compound of Nature,” where now, instead of pointing to biotite, it is clearly telling the Artist to start with vermiculite, the rock weathered from black mica by Nature, “in a manner incomprehensible to the Artist.” “The second is the compound of Art,” describing the mineral essence produced when the alchemist combines sulfuric acid with vermiculite.
 Now to the First Key, to one of its most beautiful symbolic passages:
 “Consider that it is by separation of the black, foul, and stinking fume of the Blackest Black that our astral, white, and resplendent Stone is formed, which contains in its veins the blood of the Pelican. It is at this First Purification of the Stone, and at this shining whiteness, that the work of the First Key is ended.”
 The “blackest black” corresponds to what is driven off or separated during the process, while the “white and resplendent Stone” is the extracted essence itself—clarified, active, and no longer confined within the mineral lattice. For the first time, a hint of the mineral composition it will contain appears: “It contains in its veins the blood of the Pelican.”
 In ordinary life, blood is inseparable from iron, which gives it its redness and underlies its power to carry oxygen. In alchemical imagery, the pelican is a figure of nourishment through blood. Thus, the phrase naturally points to an iron-rich, life-bearing essence: a mineral extract whose redox-active core helps explain why the alchemists spoke of it in terms of blood, feeding, and vitality.
 That suggestion becomes even more striking when set beside Shimanishi’s extract. After sulfur, iron is the second-highest concentrated active mineral in Themarox. Shimanishi appears to have understood that iron was central to many of the properties the extract displayed, as he reportedly spent twenty years searching across multiple continents for the most iron-rich mica he could find. In the end, the richest source he identified lay not halfway across the world, but within two hours of his home, in Fukushima.
 A Second Reading
 As in the last chapter, I will leave the reader with a cluster of repetitive descriptions appearing throughout The Six Keys , all circling one of the “three works” or steps. By this point, they should begin to sound less like separate instructions than like recurring views of the same operation.
 For instance, there are numerous descriptions of a liquid solution of dissolved minerals being extracted from vermiculite via the actions of sulfuric acid; here, I include only three of the many I found:
 • “Extract the seed from the body”
• “Ought the Wise Artist dissolve the Body with the Spirit”
• “Dissolution of the Body into its water”
 Then:
 “This is the Secret Fire which forms the Stone of the Philosophers by the conjunction of the Spirit with the Body, of Sulfur with Mercury.”
 For MB and me, the phrase “of Sulfur with Mercury” was the most difficult line we encountered in alchemy. We initially read “Sulfur” and “Mercury” as materials: first as sulfated rainwater acting on black mica, then as sulfuric acid acting on vermiculite. Both readings worked locally but failed as we carried them forward.
 The difficulty resolved only when we stopped treating these terms as substances and began reading them as functions.
 In that framework, “Sulfur” does not name sulfuric acid itself, but its activating function—its capacity to penetrate, react, and transform. “Mercury” does not name a separate material, but its mediating function—its capacity to dissolve, mobilize, and carry.
 Read this way, the phrase no longer describes two substances joined together, but two roles performed by the same agent. It is sulfuric acid acting simultaneously as activator and mediator, “the Spirit” working upon the “Body” to release the mineral essence.
 Seeing that is what finally got us out of the labyrinth.
 When the Three Came Into Focus
 At the outset of this sequence of chapters, I proposed that these three texts were not saying the same thing in the same way, but rather describing the same underlying chemistry and process from different angles. Having now walked through them one by one, that conclusion can be stated more plainly. The Emerald Tablet gives the larger natural order: the recurring cycle by which mineral chemistry, water, energy, and life remain linked across ascent, descent, nourishment, and return. Letter from Sternbuchta gives the portrait of the essence once brought forth: its value, its multiplication, its restorative power, and the kind of language required to describe it without exposing it too openly. The Six Keys of Eudoxus gives the guarded work itself: the sequence, misdirections, and operations by which that essence is brought forth from stone.
 Taken together, the three texts do not merely echo one another. They form a coherent structure. The Tablet gives the cycle in Nature. Sternbuchta gives the essence in view. Eudoxus gives the steps in Art. That was the interpretive framework I proposed at the outset. What these chapters have attempted to show is how and why that reading holds.
 But now that the chemistry in these texts has been decoded, it is time to turn to another kind of knowledge they preserve: not about minerals, water, and extraction, but about the human beings drawn into such work, shaped by it, and, in rare cases, brought to its end. Seeing that side of the texts hit me harder than I was prepared for, just as their insights into chemistry had. It mapped first onto Shimanishi, the modern figure I had already come to regard as a man of historic importance whose achievement history had largely missed.
 And then, more disturbingly, it began to map onto MB and, however reluctantly I say it, onto me as well.

 *If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
 Subscribe now
 From Research to Practice - Links Below Image

 Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water
 Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back To Soil
 Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States
 The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could have Ended the Pandemic
 The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health
 From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi
 The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine
 Medical Musings - A View From the Inside Of Modern Medicine

Summary: The Six Keys finally unlocked the labyrinth. What looked like alchemical misdirection began to read as a guarded map of stone, sulfur, water, and the hidden essence released from rock.


Chapter XII: Alchemy in Modern Life

The chemistry in the three Hermetic texts was only the beginning of what they contained.
 I realized this only very late in my reading of The Six Keys . I had spent an immense amount of time on the first three Keys because that was where most of the procedural detail lay. Only when I neared completion of the prior chapter did I give sufficient attention to the later Keys.
 What I found was that the author’s perspective began to shift. He moved from cryptic instruction into something more personal: a description of the conditions under which the work could actually be completed. I began to feel that he had lived through the work, suffered through it, and was writing from the other side.
 One of the most striking passages in all of The Six Keys occurs in the Second Key:
 “He who knows how to sublime the Stone philosophically, justly deserves the name of a philosopher, since he knows the Fire of the Wise, which is the only instrument which can work this sublimation. No philosopher has ever openly revealed this Secret Fire, and this powerful agent, which works all the wonders of the Art: he who shall not understand it, and not know how to distinguish it by the characters whereby it is described, ought to make a stand here, and pray to God to make it clear to him; for the knowledge of this great Secret is rather a gift of Heaven than a Light acquired by the natural force of reasoning; let him, nevertheless, read the writings of the philosophers; let him meditate; and, above all, let him pray: there is no difficulty which may not in the end be made clear by Work, Meditation, and Prayer.”
 I have read this passage many times, and each time it lands with the same force. It is pointing to the part of the path that no amount of technique can guarantee. The reader must read, work, meditate, observe, and remain devoted to the work in front of him. But Eudoxus says plainly that even this is not enough. The knowledge of the Secret Fire is “ a gift of Heaven. ”
 The Sixth Key then gives that same truth a lived dimension:
 “The Sixth Key teaches the Multiplication of the Stone, by the reiteration of the same operation, which consists but in opening and shutting, dissolving and coagulating, imbibing and drying; whereby the virtues of the Stone are infinitely augmentable.”
 “I should much bewail, if, like me, after having known the true matter, you should spend fifteen years entirely in the work, in study and in meditation, without being able to extract out of the Stone the precious juice which it encloses in its bosom, for want of knowing the secret fire of the wise . . .”
 “But I give you notice, moreover, that even after you shall be arrived at the knowledge of the Secret Fire of the Wise, yet still you shall not attain your point at your first career.”
 “. . . which makes to run out of this plant (dry and withered in appearance) a water which wets not the hands, and which by a magical union . . . is dissolved into a viscous water—into a mercurial liquor, which is the beginning, the foundation, and the Key of our Art.”
 Here, the Sixth Key is describing the conditions under which the work actually succeeds: the repetition of the same act, the long span of years, the failure even after partial understanding, and the insistence that effort alone does not get you there.
 Those who lack the patience to remain with the problem long enough will abandon it. I began to see the difficulty of The Six Keys itself as a filter for the kind of person who might succeed.
 Although Eudoxus urges the reader to read, to work, to observe, and to persist, he also makes clear that getting through the text is still not enough. The writings can point, warn, and test, but they do not carry the practitioner to the end. He has to remain with the work long enough for something more to arrive.
 And when I strip it down, the instruction becomes almost simple. You have to read. You have to work. You have to handle the materials. You have to get it wrong, again and again, and stay with it long enough to begin to see what is actually happening.
 But that is still not enough.
 Eudoxus describes the conditions under which recognition finally arrives. The moment when the meaning becomes clear is not something the practitioner can force. In his view, it comes only from Heaven.
 The Wise Artist
 What affected me most is the extent to which the text’s portrait of the “ Wise Artis t” appears to map onto Shimanishi. Everything I have learned about him points in the same direction: intensely private, never seeking recognition, prayerful, and almost unimaginably persistent. The Sixth Key speaks of the man who, “ after having known the true matter, ” might still “ spend fifteen years entirely in the work, in study and in meditation, ” unable to extract “ the precious juice ” from the Stone for lack of the “ Secret Fire. ” Shimanishi lived almost that exact pattern. He worked with rock, heat, water, and acids through repetition, failure, refinement, and return for nearly fifteen years. He had one stone, one question, and the discipline to remain with it until it finally yielded its answer.
 Other aspects of his character deepen the resemblance. I have repeatedly been told that Shimanishi spoke of his discovery with reverence, not ownership, describing it as “ a gift from our Creator. ” At the only international conference he attended that I know of, during a lecture, he is said to have remarked, “W orking with this material is like working with Angels, ” which is not the language of a typical scientist. If the Great Work is, as Eudoxus says, “ a gift of Heaven, ” then The Six Keys is describing not only a sequence of operations, but also the sort of person who can carry such a sequence through to completion: one marked by discipline, reverence, and a willingness to labor for years without recognition.
 By that measure, Shimanishi comes astonishingly close. Even more strikingly, he never publicly revealed his Secret Fire, as the operational details remain known only to the men of the Shimanishi-Kaken company he left behind. That fact, too, places him within the circle Eudoxus describes. And that is only the first convergence.
 Another is the path itself. Shimanishi followed it without The Six Keys as a guide. He began with almost nothing: a basic understanding that acids could dissolve minerals, and a question about whether those minerals could be rendered active in water. From there, he worked alone, without a theory and without any assurance that the work would succeed. If these texts describe real processes, and I believe they do, then Shimanishi appears to have arrived at them independently, through experiment, devotion, and sustained attention to a single rock.
 The texts describe a specific process. Shimanishi independently devised one that matched it. They describe the properties of a substance. Shimanishi produced a substance with those properties. They describe the character of a practitioner shaped by long obscurity, long labor, and long submission to a problem that refuses quick answers. Shimanishi’s life fits that description with extraordinary precision. Any one of these points could be questioned in isolation, but taken together they accumulate into something much harder to dismiss.
 What makes this even more striking is the path by which we recognized the convergences. The recognitions moved in two directions. Our modern scientific research helped us progress through the texts, while the texts themselves suggested connections that shaped our understanding of the science. Even now, I am not sure I could fully separate which parts of the final Rock–Water Circuit Theory came from the modern scientific literature and which from the texts of antiquity.
 At this point, I do not think these convergences can be honestly dismissed as forced mapping, retrospective construction, or a self-reinforcing interpretive framework. The consistency with which the texts map onto the science, the process, the product, and the person points to something more serious than loose analogy. It suggests that these texts documented real knowledge of a material operation, what it produces, and the type of person required to bring it to completion, even if that knowledge was preserved in symbolic and guarded form.
 That, to me, is the true significance of what has happened across these chapters. Shimanishi’s modern work has helped make ancient texts interpretable, while those texts, in turn, have helped clarify the scope and meaning of what he appears to have achieved. I do not know how often history presents us with that kind of reciprocal illumination between ancient writing and modern practice. I only know that these documents appear to be real records of a scientific and material understanding that long predated the language we would now use to describe it.
 What these chapters suggest is that the labyrinth described in alchemy has, in fact, been successfully navigated before, both in the older world and in modern times. But even that is not the full extent of the convergences gathered here.
 The Fifteen-Year Echo
 What first appeared in Shimanishi’s life began to echo again in MB’s.
 Soon after he began importing Themarox directly from Shimanishi Kaken, MB enjoyed immense early success. Then, suddenly, in 2010, his business was nearly destroyed by the launch of a coordinated disinformation campaign. What followed, in his own words, were fifteen years of obscurity: years of persistence, study, and quiet labor. He was able to make a living, and the business grew modestly over that period, largely within Amish farming communities across the Midwest, where farmers came to value Themarox for what they saw in their fields: stronger crops, less pest pressure, and a resilience they considered essential to their agriculture. But he never regained the wider distribution and awareness of Themarox that he had once achieved.
 That pattern matters. The figure described in the Six Keys was not a man at the center of things. By the nature of the work, they were set apart, working outside recognition, outside status, and often in prolonged isolation. That recurring pattern seems, within these texts, almost to function as part of the work itself.
 The same is true of companionship. Sternbuchta states it plainly: “. . . to maintain you and your companion (because one alone cannot do the Work) then the thing becomes idle.” That line lands more concretely for me now than it once did. MB spent roughly two years attempting his own extract before abandoning it, and the much longer period that followed the near destruction of his business was, in a different sense, a kind of idleness too—not inactivity, but a prolonged inability to move the work to its next stage.
 That line immediately made me recall a moment in the first months of our collaboration, when MB told me that he had once said to a colleague that he needed someone who could help him move the work forward, someone, interestingly enough, whose background and character were oddly similar to mine. Later, as the work deepened in complexity, breadth, and difficulty, I came to feel the same thing from the other side. One day, after calling him to discuss a highly nuanced and esoteric mapping, a sudden insight came upon me that I shared with him: there was no other person in the world I could have had that conversation with.
 MB laughed, reminding me that for almost the entire twenty years before our collaboration, he, too, had had no one who could truly engage with the material at the level his decades of work had brought him to. We came to this from different directions, with different training and different instincts. Yet as I write these words, I cannot help feeling that the paths leading to our eventual intersection had been set long before.
 Our work did not move in one direction. He would pour out decades of accumulated observations, intuitions, and partial syntheses, sometimes in torrents, sometimes in fragments, and they would immediately trigger questions that sent me into both modern and ancient literature. What I found there would then force him to clarify, defend, expand, or rethread what he had long held, while at other moments my research would uncover a missing link that fit directly into one of his older lines of thought.
 As the book drew toward its close, I was struck to find that this kind of partnership is also stated in The Six Keys : “without the help of a faithful friend, one remains undoubtedly in this labyrinth.”
 MB then recalled an old line from Proverbs that he had long memorized: “Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.” The word iron hit hard for me, not as a metaphor, but as describing something functional. We had already spent months tracing its centrality in the Rock–Water Circuit, in ISAW, and in the deep-to-surface gradient that feeds life through mineralized water, so to encounter that same word at the point where the texts speak of companionship and sharpening struck me as more than incidental.
 Both the Letter from Sternbuchta and The Six Keys suggest that, at some point, the work may require another person—someone capable of seeing, clarifying, or correcting what the solitary practitioner cannot.
 Then there is a coincidence that MB and I both found amusing: my name, Pierre, literally means rock, while his, Matthew, means gift of God. Forgive me for the forced mapping, but I get a kick out of the fit between our names and two conditions that seem to recur throughout The Six Keys : a source rock and something received.
 But there is something even more powerful than these convergences: at one point, the text itself appears to have altered the course of MB’s life.
 When the Text Entered the Work
 Long before I entered this work, MB had once attempted to engage the same problem Shimanishi had already solved. He was introduced to Themarox in 2004, and soon after, he started a business selling it at health and wellness events.
 His first encounter with an alchemical text occurred afterward when an acquaintance showed him the Letter from Sternbuchta . Given his unusually high level of discernment, he immediately understood it as a serious text, relevant to his work.
 Soon after, he was forced to make a decision that put his business in peril. He cut off contact with his only source of Themarox because he could no longer tolerate the man’s dishonesty and unreliability. As a result, MB found himself with little choice but to attempt the extraction himself.
 Working with vermiculite sourced from Canada, he applied the same general principles and succeeded, at least in part, in producing an aqueous mineral extract viable enough to sell and sustain a business.
 And yet, even in that success, there were discrepancies he could not ignore. The color was different. The behavior was different. Most importantly, it did not clarify water as the original. He initially understood these differences in conventional terms—variation in mineral composition, especially iron—and continued forward because what he had made was real, useful, and often validated by others.
 Then, almost two years later, he encountered The Six Keys of Eudoxus .
 He has told me that the First and Second Keys immediately struck him as describing a real process, one he recognized as corresponding to both Shimanishi’s work and his own efforts. But there was one line that cut through everything else with unusual force: “one must make use of the citrine Mercury,” together with the warning “not to be deceived on this point.”
 That word— citrine —stopped him. The color of what he had made was clear. And he knew the color of Shimanishi’s extract: golden-yellow. He understood the passage to mean that, among the possible liquors or “ Mercuries, ” one had to begin with the correct one, and that it had to be citrine.
 Another line struck him just as strongly: “even after you shall be arrived at the knowledge of the Secret Fire of the Wise, yet still you shall not attain your point at your first career . . .” He read those phrases as warnings—not simply about error, but about direction.
 In that moment, although he knew his extract was useful, he began to doubt its truth.
 He concluded that what he had produced, however real and effective, was not the thing described in the texts, but a partial approximation. Out of conviction, he stopped.
 He ended what the text itself calls a “ first career ” rather than refining it further. That is when he reached out to Shimanishi Kaken in Japan. From the outside, that decision could have looked like a retreat. In reality, it was realignment: a willingness to accept that he had come close to the process described in the texts, but had not yet arrived at the true substance.
 What makes MB’s story especially striking is that his trajectory runs in the opposite direction from the one described in The Six Keys . The Keys are written for someone trying to discover the Secret Fire. MB, by contrast, had first come into contact with the true substance through Shimanishi’s work, and then he attempted to reproduce it himself. In that sense, the text did not lead him toward the Golden Elixir. It led him back to it.
 The Point at Which the Work Became Personal
 I should say something here that I am not entirely comfortable saying, but I do think the path I have found myself on bears mentioning, because it now seems to me to echo, in its own much smaller way, the same pattern I have been tracing in the lives of Eudoxus, Shimanishi, and MB.
 By the time I reached this chapter, I had spent eight months almost entirely inside this material, though that period was not confined to alchemy. What began as an intrigue with Shimanishi’s extract widened into a much larger journey through mineral science, water, agriculture, geology, and hydrology, and only then narrowed into alchemy, where the work became more demanding still—an extended cycle of reading, failed interpretations, returns to the same passages, and a kind of fixation on a single problem that did not release its hold.
 What also struck me was that this stretch of work was unlike anything else in my life. I do not say that lightly. I had already lived through a highly demanding academic and medical career—two decades in one of the most intense specialties in medicine, years of teaching, writing, publishing, and working at a pace that had often felt unsustainable, followed by five years of uninterrupted pressure during Covid, trying to save lives while fighting institutions that refused to look. Yet these eight months imposed a different kind of concentration.
 Outside of seeing patients and trying to preserve time with my wife, I was almost continuously at a desk, reading, researching, writing, and returning to the same material. It was narrower, more isolating, and, in some ways, more consuming than anything that had come before it.
 In another departure from my usual way of working, I did not reach this point through speed, cleverness, or by expertly collecting and organizing information. I got here by staying with the material for a long time, asking the same questions again and again, and working through repeated failed interpretations. The easier readings gave way first. Only then did deeper meanings begin to appear. I wrote this section for one reason: by then, I had begun to feel caught in the same pattern I was trying to describe.
 I am not claiming equivalence with Shimanishi, nor with the author of The Six Keys . But the path described in these texts—prolonged effort, isolation, repeated failure, and eventual recognition—began to look like part of the work itself. At a certain point, the texts changed for me. They stopped feeling like fragmented historical artifacts and began to read as records of something real and still active.

 *If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
 Subscribe now
 From Research to Practice - Links Below Image

 Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water
 Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back To Soil
 Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States
 The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could have Ended the Pandemic
 The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health
 From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi
 The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine
 Medical Musings - A View From the Inside Of Modern Medicine

Summary: The alchemical texts stopped reading like riddles and began reading like records: of a process, a substance, and the kind of long, disciplined life required to bring the work through.


Chapter XIII: The Hermetic Canon: Closed

Up to this point, the focus has been on decoding the underlying operation described symbolically across the Hermetic canon. What follows is the product of that decoding: a set of operational definitions that render the canon legible by anchoring its language to a real material process.
 To our knowledge, this is the first operational reconstruction of the core roles encoded across the Hermetic and alchemical canon.
 At the risk of brief repetition, and because the table that follows requires it, I should restate the basic framework here. The Emerald Tablet , Letter from Sternbuchta , and The Six Keys of Eudoxus describe the same underlying process from three different angles: the order of the cycle, the nature of the essence it yields, and the sequence by which that essence is brought forth. Their language shifts, repeats, and sometimes appears to contradict itself because the process was being guarded. Once that process was reconstructed independently of the texts themselves, the symbols began to resolve into specific meanings.
 For the same reason, I should also restate one interpretive rule before the reader turns to the table. In alchemical texts, terms such as Sulfur, Mercury, Salt, Fire, and Stone do not name fixed substances, but roles within a process. For that reason, the same word may point to different materials depending on the stage, scale, or context in which the operation is occurring, while still preserving the same underlying function.
 The table below does not attempt to catalog every possible referent. It presents one internally consistent mapping of those roles onto a specific, real process: Nature’s Rock–Water Circuit and its laboratory extraction in Shimanishi’s work, as described in Sternbuchta and The Six Keys . In this framework, sulfur-bearing atmospheric chemistry and sulfuric acid are treated as different expressions of the same activating role.
 This is not an arbitrary selection. It is the mapping that allows the texts to resolve coherently across scales while remaining anchored to a process that can be observed, tested, and reproduced.
 Table 1. The Ariadne Key: Role Concordance Across the Hermetic Canon
 Note. The Six Keys of Eudoxus describes the sequence of operations by which a mineral essence is drawn from its rock parent and brought into concentrated form. The Letter from Sternbuchta describes the resulting essence: what it is like, how it behaves, and what it does once produced. The Emerald Tablet describes the natural cycle itself: the planetary order by which the process unfolds in Nature. The table below does not force identical vocabulary across the canon; it shows how the same underlying operation appears under different symbolic emphases.

 Canonical interpreters of alchemy have long agreed on the structural logic of these texts: the Stone is the product of conjunction, not the substrate; Mercury is a principle, not elemental metal; Sulfur is an activating force; and the Secret Fire is a penetrating solvent rather than literal flame. Across psychological, historical, and esoteric schools—Jung, Newman, Principe, Fulcanelli, and Canseliet—there is broad agreement on these points, even where interpretations diverge.
 What our work advances is the material specificity of the terms. The canon was trying to describe a real process, but it did so without naming the substances identifiably. That is why the language stayed open for centuries. Until the process and its product were realized in the world, the symbols could not be fixed to a single meaning. What was missing was the operation itself.
 In 1977, Shimanishi, in our view, supplied that missing reference. Through his work with vermiculite-derived mineral chemistry, he devised an extraction process that produced a substance whose properties correspond strikingly to what the canon had long described under different symbolic names. Once that reference existed in the modern world, the language of the texts could finally be anchored to a working operation rather than to speculation. It was only through Shimanishi’s work that the canon became legible.
 The Three Works
 There is one further feature of this work that must be addressed. We return to a line in The Six Keys that I originally interpreted in Chapter XI as referring to the three steps in the process of producing the Golden Elixir:
 “But the operations of the three works have a great deal of analogy one to another, and the philosophers do designedly speak in equivocal terms.”
 The Six Keys went over these three steps “or works” repeatedly, using constantly shifting language and metaphor: 1) biotite weathering to vermiculite, 2) sulfuric acid penetrating the porous stone, and 3) mineral essence being released. I still think that is the line’s primary meaning. However, as I sat writing this chapter, reflecting upon the coherence of these three texts separated by hundreds or thousands of years, another strange resonance occurred to me: our journey through the Hermetic canon was also confined, almost unbelievably, to just three works.
 The Hermetic and alchemical canon is vast—far beyond the three texts decoded in this book. In fact, neither MB nor I have ever knowingly engaged with any other text from the Hermetic or alchemical traditions. At one point, I tried to get a sense of how much of that literature remained outside our attention, and the scale of it was staggering. And yet the texts that actually entered our lives, held our attention, and ultimately yielded a coherent framework were just these three: The Emerald Tablet , The Six Keys of Eudoxus , and The Letter from Sternbuchta .
 That would not be especially remarkable if these were the three most obvious, most widely read, or most accessible texts in the tradition. But they are not. The Emerald Tablet is foundational and famous, yes. The Six Keys is known only within a small alchemical community. It has no mainstream scientific or academic visibility, is not commonly taught, cited, or discussed, and almost no educated reader has ever heard of it. If that is not obscure enough, it is almost impossible to describe the level of obscurity that has been accorded to Sternbuchta .
 It is so obscure as to be scarcely accessible at all and, in our case, had to reenter the work through an archived trace after more than two decades of inaccessibility. And yet it was precisely this most marginal of the three that proved indispensable. Without Sternbuchta, I do not think we could have defended the coherence of the whole. The Tablet gives the cycle. Eudoxus gives the guarded operations. Sternbuchta gives the missing bridge: the nature, value, and behavior of the essence once brought forth. Remove any one of the three, and the structure weakens. Remove Sternbuchta in particular, and I do not think it holds.
 That leaves me with a question I cannot fully answer. Why these three? Why, out of such a vast literature, did the work remain so narrowly confined? Why did MB and I, coming to this from different directions and at different times, engage no other text—nor ever seek to? And why did it turn out that only when these three were finally placed together did the canon begin to yield a coherent, material, and operational interpretation?
 I will not try to resolve that question here. My understanding of why these texts appeared in our lives comes later in the book, when the work's larger pattern comes into view. For now, I will only record the improbability of it. A line that speaks of “three works” that “ have a great deal of analogy to each other ” and which “ designedly speak in equivocal terms ” now strikes me as providing an uncannily precise description of the journey through the Hermetic canon that we just completed. Perhaps that is nothing. Perhaps it is only one more coincidence in a project already full of them. However, I find it impossible to dismiss it as an accident.
 What the Texts Are Describing
 Although neither Sternbuchta nor The Six Keys of Eudoxus uses the phrase “Golden Elixir,” both texts describe the same class of substance that Western alchemy more commonly called the Philosopher’s Stone, the tincture, the medicine, the Universal Medicine, the Water of Life, or the elixir of life. In Chinese Daoist alchemy, the corresponding idea is named more directly as the Golden Elixir, or jindan . I use “Golden Elixir” here as cross-traditional shorthand, not as a literal quotation from these texts.
 The support for that identification is not the name, but the properties. Sternbuchta calls it a “tincture,” “medicine,” “Universal-tincture,” “true medicine,” and “unending treasure,” and describes its “multiplication in quality” and “multiplication in quantity.” The Six Keys calls it the “Stone of the philosophers,” “Water of Life,” “precious liquor,” “Universal Medicine,” and “precious juice” drawn from the Stone. Across both texts, the same pattern recurs: a hidden essence brought forth from stone, rendered active through the Work, multiplied in virtue, and capable of restoration.
 That is why, in the chapters above, I have used “Golden Elixir” as the simplest name for the substance these texts appear to describe.
 The Work Completed
 Nearly two millennia after the cycle in Nature first appeared in the alchemical tradition, the core chemistry it described appears to have been realized as a tangible material that can be produced, carried, and applied: a concentrated mineral essence corresponding operationally to the sequence described in The Six Keys of Eudoxus and behaviorally to the properties described in Sternbuchta’s letter.
 What had been missing until now was the Rock–Water Circuit, a scientific framework that could integrate insights from geology, water chemistry, sulfur cycling, and mineral lattices into a single coherent process. Once biotite is understood as the imprisoned body, vermiculite as the naturally opened and receptive matrix, sulfur as the activating force, and the mercurial principle as the mediating carrier, the canon resolves without contradiction.
 In our reading, neither biotite nor vermiculite is itself the Philosopher’s Stone. In Art, it is the concentrated, multipliable mineral essence the alchemists described as the Golden Elixir and that Shimanishi produced as a rock extract. Although The Emerald Tablet does not name the Philosopher’s Stone, it describes something even more fundamental: a complete generative cycle. In our reading, what the later alchemical texts called the Stone corresponds to that cycle itself.
 The ambiguity of the canon preserved the process by requiring that Nature complete the first transformation before Art could continue it. The closed stone, biotite, had to be opened into a receptive body, vermiculite, before sulfuric acid could extract its essence. In that sense, the Stone, in the later alchemical sense of the Golden Elixir, waited to be realized in material form; before that, it could only be named, symbolized, and pursued.
 That the puzzle appears to have been solved based on the work of someone entirely outside alchemy leaves the deepest question. How could the alchemists have gained such precise knowledge of both the cycle in Nature and the means of bringing its core chemistry into form?
 We will revisit that question later in the book, but for now, the operative core of the Hermetic canon is closed. Rock, water, sulfur, and time remain at work.

 A note for readers : For those interested in how that knowledge re-entered in material form today, I invite you to explore Aurmina (“golden mineral essence”) — a name we chose before we fully understood what it pointed to, and one that will become clearer as this series unfolds. Yes, this is a product, and part of a company I am building around this work, because at some point, the work had to leave the page and enter the world.

Summary: Three ancient works became one operational key. Anchored to Shimanishi’s process, the guarded language of alchemy began to resolve into rock, water, sulfur, and time.


Chapter XIV: The Same Engine, Everywhere

At a certain point, researching alchemy no longer felt like an esoteric pursuit. Once I began to recognize that the texts were describing the same Rock–Water Circuit we had arrived at through modern literature in geochemistry, cosmology, biology, and physics, I could no longer dismiss them.
 That led to a simple question: if this level of insight was recorded here, where else might it appear? What other traditions, texts, or cultures might contain comparable observations about the processes underlying the Rock–Water Circuit?
 And the oddest part is where that trail led first: straight into the center of mainstream science, to the National Science Foundation, and from there to black mica.
 The Engine Before Biology
 Helen Hansma, a biophysicist at UC Santa Barbara who also served as a program director at the National Science Foundation, proposed something that would have sounded outrageous not long ago: that life did not begin in ponds or vents, but between sheets of mica.
 Her “Mica Hypothesis” suggests that layered silicate minerals formed natural nanoreactors—thin, charged compartments that concentrate ions, structure water, and generate mechanical energy through flexing and shear. These spaces, she argues, could have provided the conditions prebiotic chemistry needed to move toward cellular life, making mica not just a setting for emergence, but part of what enabled it.
 Mica supplies:
● Structured water films
● Potassium-rich lattices that mirror modern cells
● Charge separation and confinement
● Mechanical energy capable of driving polymerization
 In other words, before biology existed, the Earth had already established many of the conditions from which biology could emerge and on which it would later depend. The Emerald Tablet points to the same idea in symbolic form: “And as all things were from one, so all things are born from this one thing by adaptation.” Hansma gives the claim a biophysical vocabulary.
 Then I started to wonder, if modern science could get this close, what would I find in a culture that had lived for centuries among volcanic rock, sulfur springs, and mineral water?
 Japan Never Needed a Tablet
 Around this time, I also began wondering whether Shimanishi’s worldview had been shaped by something analogous to the Emerald Tablet . I knew he had never encountered Hermetic texts, as none had been translated into Japanese at the time of his achievement. So I started to explore how Japanese antiquity and theology spoke about life, matter, and order. I was looking for the assumptions that shaped how the natural world was understood and portrayed in Japanese culture.
 Although I could not find an equivalent to the Emerald Tablet , neither could I find much effort to explain the structure of the Earth or the workings of stone and water. And then it became clear why: Shinto never set out to explain what it already assumed.
 Shinto, the Japanese way of understanding the world—its theology, if the word even applies—begins from a different assumption altogether: that life, order, and vitality already exist within nature.
 In Shinto thought, the divine is already present within water, stone, mountain, and flow. Purification is the restoration of original order. Creation is understood through musubi , a generative process through which form arises from what precedes it.
 In Japan, volcanic landscapes, steam vents, and sulfurous springs are treated as places where the earth’s vitality comes openly to the surface. Onsen culture grows from this assumption: people wash, then enter the mineral springs to soak, warm the body, and let fatigue dissolve in the water. The purpose is quiet restoration, a return to balance in which heat, minerals, and stillness help the body settle back into its own order.
 What struck me immediately was that Japanese thought seemed, from the outset, to begin much closer to the phenomena I had been trying to understand, while modern Western science usually starts by breaking those same realities into parts and working backward. We will return to that idea in the next chapter.
 Once I understood that, I felt that the Emerald Tablet ’s insights would not sound foreign in Japan at all. They would sound like something already assumed.

 *If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
 Subscribe now
 From Research to Practice - Links Below Image

 Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water
 Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back To Soil
 Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States
 The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could have Ended the Pandemic
 The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health
 From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi
 The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine
 Medical Musings - A View From the Inside Of Modern Medicine

Summary: The Rock–Water Circuit began showing up everywhere: in alchemy, mica origin-of-life theory, and Japan’s instinctive reverence for mineral water, volcanic stone, and natural order.


Chapter XV: The Cornerstone That the Builders Refused

Just as MB had been the one who first led me into alchemy, he had also been doing something else in parallel, almost from the beginning. While I was buried in Hermetic texts, trying to learn their grammar and meaning, he was sending me Scripture—passages and fragments in messages, in side conversations, in the margins of everything else we were doing.
 I resisted going there, not because I dismissed it, but because I was already too deep into alchemy. It had my full attention, and I knew that if I opened Scripture too soon, it would distract me from a path that kept making connections, and I wanted to see how far I could go.
 And yet, even while I avoided it, I started to suspect more and more that it would be fruitful. Everything I was learning to see in alchemy—cycles, materials, purification, collapse, and return—MB kept insisting was already present in Scripture. Not metaphorically. Literally. I knew I would have to face that claim eventually.
 Once we closed the Hermetic canon, I turned toward Scripture. By then, the question was how I could move through that much text without losing the line of inquiry that had brought me there in the first place.
 When the Tool Matched the Question
 This work did not require artificial intelligence to generate ideas or supply conclusions. It required it to hold them in continuity. What made this possible was not speed or cleverness, but the ability to keep following the same question across geology, chemistry, biology, ancient texts, and modern data without losing the thread. Before this, the problem was simple: no human mind could hold all of that at once. AI made it possible to pursue the same line of inquiry across numerous disciplines and thousands of sources without losing continuity. I was able to ask the same simple questions about rock, water, salt, fire, and return without fatigue or forgetfulness. The same relationships that had always been present could finally be seen together rather than sequentially.
 This project was not conceived as an experiment in artificial intelligence. I did not set out to use it to cross boundaries. I used it the way one uses a microscope or telescope: to extend perception beyond the limits of unaided human attention. What surprised me was not what appeared, but how cleanly it aligned once those limits had been overcome.
 One World, Two Archives
 What that continuity made visible was that Scripture and alchemy were never describing different worlds. Once I turned toward Scripture with the same materials already in view—rock, water, salt, fire, spirits—I found myself reading across a second archive. The language was different. The world it described was the same.
 MB had opened the door to Scripture as a symbolic record of creation, and AI made it possible to move through that record at scale and speed. I could finally ask the blunt questions I had been inching toward for months. Where does Scripture speak of rock? Of stone? Of clay? Of water emerging from rock? Of salt, fire, brimstone, return to dust? What startled me was how little effort it required. The repetitions surfaced immediately. They recurred across books, authors, and centuries with remarkable consistency, and I remember stopping, sitting back, and feeling my pulse change, because by then it was no longer a single correspondence but an accumulation.
 Scripture named the same elements consistently, framing them in the contexts of creation, breakdown, purification, and renewal. Very quickly, I began to recognize the same physical processes I had already pieced together across geology, biology, chemistry, hydrology, and related sciences, and the overlap felt concrete and specific, grounded in my now deeper understanding of Earth’s cycles after months of scientific research.
 The major difference lay in the mode of description. Alchemy tracks the recurring process of formation, breakdown, purification, and renewal through matter and transformation. Scripture presents that same process through narrative, law, prophecy, and covenant, using the same materials while embedding them within events and history. Alchemy maps the structure of the cycle, while Scripture preserves its passage through human history. Both describe how order forms, collapses, and is restored through the same underlying movements of the world.
 By then, we had already assembled the science supporting the Rock–Water Circuit, and the connections between the Hermetic texts and that circuit had been firmly established. What I still needed to know was whether Scripture recorded evidence of that same circuit as well, and I became convinced that it would. And it did. In Scripture I found water emerging from rock, salt as covenant, fire as refinement, and dust as both origin and return. I was reading these passages as materially specific as much as symbolic. The texts read as if they carried assumptions about how matter is formed and about the conditions on which life depends for stability, renewal, and endurance.
 What Scripture provided were repeated material descriptions conveyed through symbolism, and those descriptions became far more intelligible once placed beside what modern science now knows. Scripture did not supply the detailed chemistry. Modern science did. What the ancient texts recorded was the sequence of the process—its unfolding, its breakdowns, and its renewals—while modern science supplied the mechanisms that explain it in material terms.
 The problem, then, was never accuracy. It was separation, because the ancient world documented the pattern while modern science identified the mechanisms, and once those two were seen together, the next question became unavoidable: why had they remained separated for so long?
 What No Single Discipline Can See
 Modern scientific methods describe these processes with a level of detail that would have been unimaginable to the authors of Scripture. The chemistry is exact, the measurements are precise, and the mechanisms have been tested and are real. But they are most often described in isolation—geology here, biology there, chemistry somewhere else—not because broader questions are forbidden, but because modern science is structured that way for maximal advancement.
 Following a process across domains is not prohibited; it is just unwieldy. It is slower, messier, harder to fund, harder to publish (I will report back on that shortly), and far more difficult to evaluate. Coordinating a Byzantine network of concepts, methods, and literatures across fields is inefficient compared with staying in one lane and going deeper, so most scientists, quite reasonably, choose the easier path: know one thing extremely well, and know more of it tomorrow.
 Modern scientific advances are increasingly rigorous, but they remain local. The result is fragmented knowledge. At one point, it struck me that what we were calling the Rock–Water Circuit was assembled from half a dozen scientific disciplines, and I could not think of another example in modern science that did the same. It began to seem possible that what we were doing was, at least in that sense, unusual, perhaps even unprecedented. That alone explains a great deal, but not all of it, because beyond the fragmented nature of modern science lies another limit, less visible and more consequential.
 At first, I thought human limitation, disciplinary fragmentation, and cognitive load were the boundaries I had been pressing against. But there was another one—deeper, quieter, and more absolute.
 The Boundary Beyond the Boundary
 What eventually clarified itself in my mind was something I had already sensed without fully articulating: modern scientific inquiry is constrained by an unspoken restriction that runs beneath all disciplines, namely, that explanation must stop short of saying that nature was created, ordered, or intended by God. In Chapter VII, I examined the consequences of methodological naturalism, which came to dominate in the nineteenth century: the rule that scientific explanation must restrict itself to testable, observable phenomena and set aside questions of purpose, even when the order and functional coherence of living systems make such questions difficult to avoid.
 I crossed that boundary before I had language for it. I still remember the first dinner MB and I ever had together, our first meeting in person, when he began telling me what he thought he was seeing in the old texts and where he believed this work was leading. I remember feeling a little overwhelmed, almost incredulous, because he was effectively suggesting that I was brushing up against something supernatural, and I suspect the few drinks I had that night helped me take it in without fully grappling with it. The conversation ran for hours, covered a great deal of ground, and that particular moment dissolved into the rest of the evening. For months afterward, our focus remained where it had begun, deep in the biochemistry of minerals.
 By the time I turned seriously to The Six Keys , I knew I was studying something that did not belong wholly inside conventional science, yet the crossing itself went by almost unnoticed. I did not experience it as a dramatic rupture. I took it up the way I would have taken up a dense paper on mitochondria, reading closely, pushing on the details, and trying to see how tightly the pieces fit. Once I became convinced that those texts contained descriptions of Shimanishi’s work with a specificity that should have been impossible, the whole thing still felt, in one sense, like an intellectual exercise, a puzzle I wanted to push as far as it would go. That was not because it lacked excitement. Quite the opposite. More than once, after one decoding or another, I would call MB almost breathless, half-delirious with excitement and shock. But even then, I think I was still experiencing it more as the satisfaction of solving a hard problem than as a man sitting still with what solving it might actually mean.
 That, in retrospect, is what matters here. I did not set out to challenge methodological naturalism. I did not even know it had a name, and I certainly did not think I was wandering into philosophy. I was following mechanisms. I kept tracing the same mineral-water cycle across domains, across timescales, and across texts, ancient and modern, without first asking which questions were permitted. I did not begin this work with a conclusion about design. I simply refused to rule it out in advance. I simply refused to rule it out in advance, and that single choice altered the shape of what could appear. If the Earth is the product of intelligence, then coherence, efficiency, and self-perpetuation should be visible in its most fundamental systems. If it is not, then whatever order appears should be fragile, accidental, and short-lived.
 Then something unexpected happened. The relationships between modernity and antiquity did not fragment when they crossed those boundaries. They aligned. The same cycle modern science could describe with extraordinary precision was already present in ancient texts—recognized, named, and preserved without the chemistry, but with astonishing fidelity to the process itself. I could only see that coherence once both limits were loosened: once mechanisms were allowed to speak across disciplines, and once design was no longer ruled out in advance.
 Once that became clear, a line of Scripture I had encountered countless times began to register in an entirely different way.
 The Stone the Builders Refused
 The boundary I had crossed hit home for me one day when I came across a line I had heard countless times before and, alongside it, an interpretation that struck me.
 “The stone that the builders refuse, shall be the head cornerstone.”
—Psalm 118:22 (KJV)
 Traditionally, this verse is understood as referring to Christ. Here, I am reading it in a different but related way: as the refusal of something foundational by those responsible for building.
 I had heard that line before—sang it along with Bob Marley for most of my life—but I had never really stopped to ask what it meant. I discovered that the builders are the ones who decide what counts as foundational: religious authorities, scholars, and experts. To refuse a stone is to judge it unsuitable, irregular, or incompatible with the prevailing model. Yet the stone chosen for the cornerstone fixes the alignment of the entire structure, determining its orientation, load-bearing capacity, and long-term stability. If a critical stone is rejected when it should have been selected as load-bearing, the entire structure is compromised from the outset.
 At that point the verse began to read like a description of what I had already been seeing in modern science. Methodological naturalism, as I had been describing it, functions precisely by refusing certain categories at the outset, especially intention, purpose, and design. In that reading, “the stone” is the possibility that the Earth has been designed, and the rejection of that possibility is not ancient at all, but relatively recent, hardening in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as Darwinian chance became the default explanatory frame for biology and even cosmology.
 I had already pondered the implications of believing we had discovered a similar mechanistic and structural relationship across geology, hydrology, chemistry, and biology. What had initially looked fragmented had resolved into a closed, self-perpetuating system. The idea of design started to look like a true cornerstone. What would modern science allow those alignments to point to when laid out together? I knew that science could describe each instance in isolation. Whether it could follow those alignments across domains to their implications rested on the question of whether it would reject the stone.
 What remained was to gather the scriptural evidence carefully enough, and lay it out clearly enough, that the implications would be hard to ignore. If modern science was going to reject the stone, I wanted to make that as difficult as possible.

 *If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
 Subscribe now
 From Research to Practice - Links Below Image

 Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water
 Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back To Soil
 Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States
 The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could have Ended the Pandemic
 The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health
 From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi
 The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine
 Medical Musings - A View From the Inside Of Modern Medicine

Summary: Scripture and alchemy began to read as two archives of the same world. Once design was no longer ruled out in advance, the rejected stone looked increasingly like the cornerstone.


You Should Be Reading Paul Marik—One Of The Best Clinician-Scientists I Have Ever Met

You should be reading Paul Marik’s new Substack (especially his recent and most popular post titled “ How Nutrition Shapes The Cancer Battlefield” ).
 My Friend, My Colleague, My Brother-In-Arms
 There are very few men in medicine I trust the way I trust Paul Marik.
 As many of my readers know, Paul and I didn’t just work together. We went to war together.
 We co-founded the FLCCC and stood shoulder to shoulder against one of the most corrupt and oppressive episodes in modern medical history. We paid for it. Jobs lost. Careers derailed. Board certifications stripped. Reputations attacked. Marriages lost. . The full weight of the machine came for us.
 And through all of it, Paul never stopped doing what he has always done better than anyone I know: following the science all the way down.
 That was always his gift. Long before the world knew his name from COVID, Paul was already a giant in critical care medicine. He had built a career on refusing to take anything he was taught for granted. He was never impressed by consensus for its own sake.
 He always went back to the foundations, back to the original science, back to the studies and the assumptions underlying them. And time and again, he found the same thing: entire practices, dogmas, and “settled” conclusions built on bad interpretation, weak evidence, or shifting sand as a foundation. That is why he was always upending consensus. It is also why his lectures were legendary. Standing room only. Everybody wanted to know what Marik thought about the latest emerging therapeutic trends.
 Further, he was, quite literally, the most published practicing ICU physician in the history of the field. And not just prolific—precise, careful, and relentless about supporting his views based on published scientific evidence.
 So it should surprise no one that after the system exiled him from our specialty, he dove deep into a new field, where there was even more consensus to overturn.
 Paul turned his focus to cancer, specifically the metabolic theory of cancer , and his book, Cancer Care, is, to me, unparalleled as it is a deeply scientific, review and grading of the evidence base for dozens of repurposed drugs and neutraceuticals. Spoiler alert: of the over 250 repurposed drugs and 2,000 nutraceuticals touted on the internet or by practitioners, only about 50 have sufficient published evidence to form a scientific opinion or recommendation on.
 We’ve been using Paul’s work in our own cancer practice at the Leading Edge Clinic as it has directly shaped how we think about and treat these patients. The central theory is simple and was first validated in 2010 based on the work of Thomas Seyfried: cancer is a metabolic disease first, and the genetic mutations arise downstream from it.
 He is the Principal Investigator of our Leading Edge Clinic study on the use of combination repurposed drug therapy and dietary interventions as adjunctive therapies in cancer.
 His new Substack, Marik’s Cancer & Metabolic Healing Playbook , is exactly what you would expect from him: practical, science-driven, and fearless. He is tackling cancer with diet, repurposed drugs, and targeted nutraceuticals based on physiology and evidence.
 In the post I’m highlighting today, “ Metabolic Wars: How Nutrition Shapes the Cancer Battlefield ,” he lays out something all of my patients’ “system” oncologists still ignore: that what they eat is foundational. Food is signaling, chemistry, and energy that can support or undermine tumor growth.
 That is where medicine is going (eventually), whether the old guard likes it or not.
 Paul has always had a gift for seeing what matters before the institutions are ready to admit it. He did it in critical care. He did it during COVID. And now he is doing it in cancer.
 And if cancer is not something you are dealing with personally, then send this to someone who is. Send it to a patient, a friend, a family member, a caregiver, someone who needs to know there are still serious physicians doing serious work outside the walls of a badly broken system.
 We’ve been through a lot together. We’ve seen how “the system” behaves when challenged. And we’ve both come out the other side still doing the same thing we always did, trying to understand what actually works, and then telling people the truth about it.
 If you follow my work, you should be following Paul’s.
 He is one of the sharpest clinical scientists I know, and he is now focused on one of the most important problems in medicine.
 Go read him.
 *If you value the late nights and deep dives into all the “rabbit holes” I write about (or the Op-Eds and lectures I generate for the public), your support is greatly appreciated.
 Subscribe now

 From Research to Practice - Links Below Images

 Aurmina – The Mineral Extract For Naturally Vitalized Drinking Water
 Primora Bio - Bringing Life Back to Soil
 The Blueprint of Life - The Hidden Architecture That Powers Life and Health
 From Volcanoes to Vitality -The Untold Story of Asao Shimanishi
 The War on Chlorine Dioxide - The Medicine That Could End Medicine
 The War on Ivermectin - The Medicine That Could Have Ended The Pandemic
 Leading Edge Clinic - Tele-Medicine Clinic Caring For Patients in All 50 States

Summary: I’m highlighting Part 1 of one of the most important and widely read research on cancer I’ve seen in years—Paul Marik's Substack and his recent series on how nutrition shapes the cancer battlefield.